From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: exynos: Fix for memory leak in case SoC name does not match Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 18:59:15 +0530 Message-ID: <20150808132915.GP6939@linux> References: <04f401d0ce89$81073900$8315ab00$@kernel.org> <9283770.jQmuxWnYst@vostro.rjw.lan> <55C5B182.6000509@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f170.google.com ([209.85.192.170]:35348 "EHLO mail-pd0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932740AbbHHN3T (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Aug 2015 09:29:19 -0400 Received: by pdrg1 with SMTP id g1so55058043pdr.2 for ; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 06:29:19 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55C5B182.6000509@samsung.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Kukjin Kim , Lukasz Majewski , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Linux PM list , shailendra.capricorn@gmail.com On 08-08-15, 16:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > The cpufreq driver will be removed completely in v4.3 or v4.4 with > patchset adding cpufreq-dt support for Exynos 4x12. This means that this > patch makes sense only for 4.2 and as a stable backport (but it was not > marked as such). > > Anyone thinks that the patch will be worth stable back-porting? Doesn't look worth enough to me.. -- viresh