From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: 3.18: lockdep problems in cpufreq Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 08:49:25 +0100 Message-ID: <20150812074925.GG7557@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20141214213655.GA11285@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20150518185645.GA28053@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <2574268.XBqpdL2VLI@vostro.rjw.lan> <20150811170357.GA24529@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20150812051659.GI32049@linux> <20150812072129.GD7557@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20150812073530.GA16445@linux> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from pandora.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:53619 "EHLO pandora.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753797AbbHLHtg (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2015 03:49:36 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150812073530.GA16445@linux> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Eduardo Valentin , Yadwinder Singh Brar , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 01:05:30PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 12-08-15, 08:21, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > Maybe not - I often lose track of which patches are in what state - > > tracking the state of 250+ patches over many months and in some cases > > _years_ is not easy. > > I agree.. > > > That's still no reason for Eduardo to _completely_ ignore this thread, > > especially when Rafael explicitly tried to get comment from Eduardo. > > Oh, no. I am not trying to be anybody's advocate here. I was just > highlighting the point here, that I remembered. > > Even I was quite busy then and couldn't get back to it. > > Lets fix this now. I believe you have a patch for this based on latest > kernel? Mind pasting that here for quick review? I don't think it's changed much since the original, but I've posted what's in linux-next as of today, and it doesn't conflict with anything. So there's no excuse about getting it merged. The problem will be back-porting it to stable kernels, because I think it's had to be updated at least a couple of times. I don't have the old versions anymore, so I'm just going to say "not my problem" - sorry. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.