From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
nm@ti.com, sboyd@codeaurora.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, khilman@linaro.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/6] PM / OPP: Free resources and properly return error on failure
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 12:03:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150812090351.GE32040@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150812082302.GD16445@linux>
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 01:53:02PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 12-08-15, 11:11, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > If it doesn't WARN() then it's not buggy, but it's still ugly. We
> > should not call of_free_opp_table() because we *tried* to add an OPP, we
> > should only call it if we *succeeded*.
>
> This is done in order to write lesser code.
I have been trying to discourage you from focusing so much on the
writing fewer lines. That little bunny hop "goto put_opp_np;" at the
end of the success path should be replaced with:
of_node_put(opp_np);
return 0;
It's one extra line of code, but "return 0;" is so much more clear. A
lot of my focus for the past few years has been on error handling so I
am perhaps more sensitive than many devs. But here is what I like:
success_path();
if (fail)
fail_path();
success_path();
success_path();
success_path();
if (fail)
fail_path();
success_path();
return 0;
more_fail:
fail_path();
fail:
fail_path();
return ret;
The success path is a list of commands indented one tab. The fail path
is intended two tabs or in reverse order at the bottom of the function
indented one tab. This uses the minimum amount of if statements and
indenting.
In the original code, we had:
success_path();
if (fail)
fail_path();
success_path();
success_path();
success_path();
if (success) {
success_path();
if (fail)
fail_path();
} else {
fail_path();
}
free:
success_and_fail_path();
return ret;
The original code was confusing and, as a direct result, buggy. Now we
have improved the code so it looks something like this:
success_path();
if (fail)
fail_path();
success_path();
success_path();
success_path();
if (fail)
fail_path();
goto free;
more_fail:
fail_path();
free:
success_and_fail_path();
return ret;
It's a lot better but it would be better yet with a return 0;. There is
an earlier goto put_opp_np on the success path, but that's fine. It's
not the normal success path so it's necessarily complicated.
Anyway, here is what I would suggest:
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
index 51b220e..243317c 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
@@ -1317,19 +1317,23 @@ static int _of_init_opp_table_v2(struct device *dev,
/* We have opp-list node now, iterate over it and add OPPs */
for_each_available_child_of_node(opp_np, np) {
- count++;
-
ret = _opp_add_static_v2(dev, np);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "%s: Failed to add OPP, %d\n", __func__,
ret);
break;
}
+ count++;
}
/* There should be one of more OPP defined */
- if (WARN_ON(!count))
+ if (WARN_ON(!count)) {
+ ret = -ENOENT;
goto put_opp_np;
+ }
+ if (ret)
+ goto free_table;
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-12 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-11 10:34 [PATCH V2 0/6] PM / OPP: Add debugfs support Viresh Kumar
2015-08-11 10:34 ` [PATCH V2 1/6] PM / OPP: Free resources and properly return error on failure Viresh Kumar
2015-08-11 14:43 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-08-11 14:59 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-08-11 17:11 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-08-12 6:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-08-12 8:11 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-08-12 8:23 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-08-12 9:03 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2015-08-12 10:10 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-08-12 10:52 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-08-11 10:34 ` [PATCH V2 2/6] PM / OPP: reuse of_parse_phandle() Viresh Kumar
2015-08-11 10:34 ` [PATCH V2 3/6] PM / OPP: Prefix exported opp routines with dev_pm_opp_ Viresh Kumar
2015-08-11 10:34 ` [PATCH V2 4/6] PM / OPP: Move opp core to its own directory Viresh Kumar
2015-08-11 10:34 ` [PATCH V2 5/6] PM / OPP: Move cpu specific code to opp/cpu.c Viresh Kumar
2015-08-11 10:34 ` [PATCH V2 6/6] PM / OPP: Add debugfs support Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150812090351.GE32040@mwanda \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).