From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cw00.choi@samsung.com, rufus.hamade@imgtec.com,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] PM / OPP: add a function to get the voltage for disabled OPPs
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:29:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150815055925.GJ1162@linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1439575020-3447-3-git-send-email-javi.merino@arm.com>
On 14-08-15, 18:56, Javi Merino wrote:
> The OPP library is now used for power models to calculate the power
> that a device would consume at a specific OPP. To do that, we use a
> simple power model which takes frequency and voltage as inputs. We get
> the voltage and frequency from the OPP library.
>
> The devfreq cooling device for the thermal framework controls temperature
> by disabling OPPs. The power model needs to calculate the power that
> would be consumed if we reenabled the OPP. dev_pm_opp_get_voltage()
> doesn't work for disabled OPPs.
>
> Add a dev_pm_opp_get_voltage_always() that works both for enabled and
> disabled OPPs to be used by the power model. The documentation for this
> function clearly states that you should use dev_pm_opp_get_voltage()
> instead unless you know what you're doing.
>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/power/opp.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/pm_opp.h | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> index 677fb2843553..b1a4216c7ec3 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> @@ -182,6 +182,43 @@ unsigned long dev_pm_opp_get_voltage(struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_get_voltage);
>
> /**
> + * dev_pm_opp_get_voltage_always() - Gets the voltage corresponding to an opp
> + * @opp: opp for which voltage has to be returned for
> + *
> + * This function is similar to dev_pm_opp_get_voltage() except that it
> + * works for disabled opps as well. In most cases, you want to
> + * operate only on available opps so you should use
> + * dev_pm_opp_get_voltage() instead.
> + *
> + * Return: voltage in micro volt corresponding to the opp, else
> + * return 0
> + *
> + * Locking: This function must be called under rcu_read_lock(). opp is a rcu
> + * protected pointer. This means that opp which could have been fetched by
> + * opp_find_freq_{exact,ceil,floor} functions is valid as long as we are
> + * under RCU lock. The pointer returned by the opp_find_freq family must be
> + * used in the same section as the usage of this function with the pointer
> + * prior to unlocking with rcu_read_unlock() to maintain the integrity of the
> + * pointer.
> + */
> +unsigned long dev_pm_opp_get_voltage_always(struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
> +{
> + struct dev_pm_opp *tmp_opp;
> + unsigned long v = 0;
> +
> + opp_rcu_lockdep_assert();
> +
> + tmp_opp = rcu_dereference(opp);
> + if (unlikely(IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tmp_opp)))
> + pr_err("%s: Invalid parameters\n", __func__);
> + else
> + v = tmp_opp->u_volt;
> +
> + return v;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_get_voltage_always);
I will rather update dev_pm_opp_get_voltage() and remove the
'available' check. There is no need for that.
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-15 5:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-14 17:56 [PATCH v4 0/5] Devfreq cooling device Javi Merino
2015-08-14 17:56 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] PM / devfreq: cache the last call to get_dev_status() Javi Merino
2015-08-14 17:56 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] PM / OPP: add a function to get the voltage for disabled OPPs Javi Merino
2015-08-15 5:59 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-08-17 9:05 ` Javi Merino
2015-08-14 17:56 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] thermal: Add devfreq cooling Javi Merino
2015-08-17 18:39 ` Javi Merino
2015-08-20 22:32 ` Eduardo Valentin
2015-08-14 17:56 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] devfreq_cooling: add trace information Javi Merino
2015-08-14 17:57 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] PM / devfreq: drop comment about thermal setting max_freq Javi Merino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150815055925.GJ1162@linux \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=javi.merino@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rufus.hamade@imgtec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).