From: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
To: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <joeyli.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com>, Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/16] x86/efi: Generating random HMAC key for siging hibernate image
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:40:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150820204044.GG2567@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1439273796-25359-7-git-send-email-jlee@suse.com>
On Tue, 11 Aug, at 02:16:26PM, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> This patch adds codes in EFI stub for generating and storing the
> HMAC key in EFI boot service variable for signing hibernate image.
>
> Per rcf2104, the length of HMAC-SHA1 hash result is 20 bytes, and
> it recommended the length of key the same with hash rsult, means
> also 20 bytes. Using longer key would not significantly increase
> the function strength. Due to the nvram space is limited in some
> UEFI machines, so using the minimal recommended length 20 bytes
> key that will stored in boot service variable.
I'm having a hard time understanding the middle part of this
paragraph, specifically the part of the key and the hash result.
There's a typo in the subject too s/siging/signing/and "Generating"
should be "Generate".
> The HMAC key stored in EFI boot service variable, GUID is
> HIBERNATIONKey-fe141863-c070-478e-b8a3-878a5dc9ef21.
I'd really like to see some of the explanation from your cover letter
included in the commit message for this patch, and in particular why
signing hibernate images is a good thing.
Recording that for posterity in the commit message is going to be
helpful when someone looks at this patch in 2 years time and wonders
why RNG support was added to the EFI stub and why they might want to
sign hibernate images.
> Reviewed-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.com>
> Tested-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/include/asm/suspend.h | 9 ++++++
> include/linux/suspend.h | 3 ++
> 3 files changed, 72 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
> index 0ffb6db..463aa9b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #include <asm/efi.h>
> #include <asm/setup.h>
> #include <asm/desc.h>
> +#include <asm/suspend.h>
>
> #include "../string.h"
> #include "eboot.h"
> @@ -1383,6 +1384,63 @@ free_mem_map:
> return status;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATE_VERIFICATION
> +#define HIBERNATION_KEY \
> + ((efi_char16_t [15]) { 'H', 'I', 'B', 'E', 'R', 'N', 'A', 'T', 'I', 'O', 'N', 'K', 'e', 'y', 0 })
> +#define HIBERNATION_KEY_ATTRIBUTE (EFI_VARIABLE_NON_VOLATILE | \
> + EFI_VARIABLE_BOOTSERVICE_ACCESS)
> +
> +static void setup_hibernation_keys(struct boot_params *params)
> +{
> + unsigned long key_size;
> + unsigned long attributes;
> + struct hibernation_keys *keys;
> + efi_status_t status;
> +
> + /* Allocate setup_data to carry keys */
> + status = efi_call_early(allocate_pool, EFI_LOADER_DATA,
> + sizeof(struct hibernation_keys), &keys);
> + if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) {
> + efi_printk(sys_table, "Failed to alloc mem for hibernation keys\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + memset(keys, 0, sizeof(struct hibernation_keys));
> +
> + status = efi_call_early(get_variable, HIBERNATION_KEY,
> + &EFI_HIBERNATION_GUID, &attributes,
> + &key_size, keys->hibernation_key);
Tiny nit, but could you put a new line here please? This is a large
chunk of code.
> + if (status == EFI_SUCCESS && attributes != HIBERNATION_KEY_ATTRIBUTE) {
> + efi_printk(sys_table, "A hibernation key is not boot service variable\n");
> + memset(keys->hibernation_key, 0, HIBERNATION_DIGEST_SIZE);
> + status = efi_call_early(set_variable, HIBERNATION_KEY,
> + &EFI_HIBERNATION_GUID, attributes, 0,
> + NULL);
> + if (status == EFI_SUCCESS) {
> + efi_printk(sys_table, "Cleaned existing hibernation key\n");
> + status = EFI_NOT_FOUND;
> + }
> + }
Hmm.. it's not clear to me that we should be deleting this EFI
variable if the attributes are bogus. It would be safer to just bail.
> +
> + if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) {
> + efi_printk(sys_table, "Failed to get existing hibernation key\n");
> +
> + efi_get_random_key(sys_table, params, keys->hibernation_key,
> + HIBERNATION_DIGEST_SIZE);
> +
> + status = efi_call_early(set_variable, HIBERNATION_KEY,
> + &EFI_HIBERNATION_GUID,
> + HIBERNATION_KEY_ATTRIBUTE,
> + HIBERNATION_DIGEST_SIZE,
> + keys->hibernation_key);
> + if (status != EFI_SUCCESS)
> + efi_printk(sys_table, "Failed to set hibernation key\n");
You're leaking 'keys' here.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/suspend.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/suspend.h
> index 2fab6c2..ab463c4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/suspend.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/suspend.h
> @@ -3,3 +3,12 @@
> #else
> # include <asm/suspend_64.h>
> #endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATE_VERIFICATION
> +#include <linux/suspend.h>
> +
> +struct hibernation_keys {
> + unsigned long hkey_status;
> + u8 hibernation_key[HIBERNATION_DIGEST_SIZE];
> +};
> +#endif
Have you given any thought to how things are going to work if we
change the hash function in the future, or provide a choice? That
information doesn't appear anywhere in the above struct.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-20 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-11 6:16 [PATCH v2 00/16] Signature verification of hibernate snapshot Lee, Chun-Yi
2015-08-11 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] PM / hibernate: define HMAC algorithm and digest size of hibernation Lee, Chun-Yi
2015-08-11 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] x86/efi: Add get and set variable to EFI services pointer table Lee, Chun-Yi
[not found] ` <1439273796-25359-3-git-send-email-jlee-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-19 16:35 ` Matt Fleming
2015-08-11 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] x86/boot: Public getting random boot function Lee, Chun-Yi
2015-08-11 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] x86/efi: Generating random number in EFI stub Lee, Chun-Yi
2015-08-20 14:12 ` Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <20150820141221.GC2567-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-27 4:06 ` joeyli
2015-08-11 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] x86/efi: Get entropy through EFI random number generator protocol Lee, Chun-Yi
2015-08-20 14:47 ` Matt Fleming
2015-08-27 4:51 ` joeyli
[not found] ` <1439273796-25359-6-git-send-email-jlee-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-20 20:26 ` Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <20150820202620.GF2567-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-27 6:17 ` joeyli
2015-08-11 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] x86/efi: Generating random HMAC key for siging hibernate image Lee, Chun-Yi
2015-08-20 20:40 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2015-08-27 9:04 ` joeyli
[not found] ` <20150827090452.GB27415-empE8CJ7fzk2xCFIczX1Fw@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-09 12:15 ` Matt Fleming
2015-09-13 2:47 ` joeyli
2015-08-11 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] efi: Make efi_status_to_err() public Lee, Chun-Yi
2015-08-20 15:07 ` Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <20150820150706.GE2567-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-27 9:06 ` joeyli
2015-08-11 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] x86/efi: Carrying hibernation key by setup data Lee, Chun-Yi
[not found] ` <1439273796-25359-9-git-send-email-jlee-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-15 17:07 ` Pavel Machek
2015-08-16 5:28 ` joeyli
2015-08-16 21:23 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-08-17 6:54 ` Nigel Cunningham
2015-08-21 12:40 ` Matt Fleming
2015-08-27 9:28 ` joeyli
2015-08-11 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] PM / hibernate: Reserve hibernation key and erase footprints Lee, Chun-Yi
2015-08-13 2:45 ` Chen, Yu C
2015-08-13 3:25 ` joeyli
2015-08-13 14:33 ` joeyli
[not found] ` <1439273796-25359-10-git-send-email-jlee-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-21 13:27 ` Matt Fleming
2015-08-27 10:21 ` joeyli
2015-09-09 12:24 ` Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <20150909122408.GE4973-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-13 2:58 ` joeyli
2015-08-11 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] PM / hibernate: Generate and verify signature of hibernate snapshot Lee, Chun-Yi
2015-08-11 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] PM / hibernate: Avoid including hibernation key to hibernate image Lee, Chun-Yi
2015-08-11 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] PM / hibernate: Forward signature verifying result and key to image kernel Lee, Chun-Yi
2015-08-11 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] PM / hibernate: Add configuration to enforce signature verification Lee, Chun-Yi
2015-08-11 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] PM / hibernate: Allow user trigger hibernation key re-generating Lee, Chun-Yi
2015-08-11 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] PM / hibernate: Bypass verification logic on legacy BIOS Lee, Chun-Yi
2015-08-11 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] PM / hibernate: Document signature verification of hibernate snapshot Lee, Chun-Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150820204044.GG2567@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--to=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=jlee@suse.com \
--cc=joeyli.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=jwboyer@redhat.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.garrett@nebula.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).