linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: pass policy to ->get() driver callback
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 21:48:02 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150911161802.GR9650@linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1725227.VMGKuhRxma@vostro.rjw.lan>

On 10-09-15, 23:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> BTW, I wonder how much of the stuff in cpufreq.h can be moved to a local header
> under drivers/cpufreq/.  It looks like the majority of it is not used by
> anybody else.

Okay, will check that out and do some cleanup.

> ---
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Subject: cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Use cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() in ->get()
> 
> cpufreq_cpu_get() called by get_cur_freq_on_cpu() is overkill,
> because the ->get() callback is always invoked in a context in
> which all of the conditions checked by cpufreq_cpu_get() are
> guaranteed to be satisfied.
> 
> Use cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() instead of it and drop the
> corresponding cpufreq_cpu_put() from get_cur_freq_on_cpu().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c |    3 +--
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c      |    2 +-
>  include/linux/cpufreq.h        |    5 +++++
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -375,12 +375,11 @@ static unsigned int get_cur_freq_on_cpu(
>  
>  	pr_debug("get_cur_freq_on_cpu (%d)\n", cpu);
>  
> -	policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> +	policy = cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(cpu);
>  	if (unlikely(!policy))
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	data = policy->driver_data;
> -	cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
>  	if (unlikely(!data || !data->freq_table))
>  		return 0;
>  
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -238,13 +238,13 @@ int cpufreq_generic_init(struct cpufreq_
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_generic_init);
>  
> -/* Only for cpufreq core internal use */
>  struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
>  	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
>  
>  	return policy && cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus) ? policy : NULL;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_cpu_get_raw);
>  
>  unsigned int cpufreq_generic_get(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
> Index: linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -129,9 +129,14 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
>  #define CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ANY	 (3) /* Freq can be set from any dependent CPU*/
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
> +struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(unsigned int cpu);
>  struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get(unsigned int cpu);
>  void cpufreq_cpu_put(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
>  #else
> +static inline struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +	return NULL;
> +}
>  static inline struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
>  	return NULL;

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-11 16:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-31 10:44 [PATCH] cpufreq: pass policy to ->get() driver callback Viresh Kumar
2015-09-03  4:45 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-09-04 14:50   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-10  1:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-10  1:22   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-09-10 21:36     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-11 16:18       ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-09-15  7:39         ` Viresh Kumar
2015-09-15  7:58           ` Viresh Kumar
2015-09-16  1:30           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-10 21:40     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-10 21:59     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-15  7:54       ` Viresh Kumar
2015-09-16  1:42         ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150911161802.GR9650@linux \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=kristen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).