From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: dfll: Properly protect OPP list Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:54:05 -0700 Message-ID: <20150914195405.GB21561@codeaurora.org> References: <1441893321-4563-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@gmail.com> <20150910175144.GB15099@codeaurora.org> <20150911023527.GS5266@linux> <20150911113531.GA16323@ulmo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150911113531.GA16323@ulmo> Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Thierry Reding Cc: Viresh Kumar , Alexandre Courbot , Stephen Warren , Mikko Perttunen , Tuomas Tynkkynen , Krzysztof Kozlowski , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 09/11, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 08:05:27AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 10-09-15, 10:51, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > Don't we already have an rcu_read_lock() at the beginning of this > > > function? I don't understand why we need to nest them in the same > > > function. > > > > +1 > > My bad, I wasn't looking closely enough. The second hunk can be dropped. > Ok. I applied the first hunk to clk-fixes. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project