From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: Voltage setting on chained regulators, how?
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 11:07:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150925090724.GH7858@pengutronix.de> (raw)
Hi,
On i.MX6 we have the situation that the CPU is supplied by a SoC
internal linear regulator which in turn is supplied by an external
switching regulator:
---> Switching regulator ---> LDO ---> CPU
For energy efficiency reasons we want to minimize the dropout voltage on
the LDO.
Any idea how such a scenario could be implemented? The regulator
framework already has some idea of supply regulators, but it only takes
care of en/disabling the supplies and will not change the voltage on the
supplies. Should this be implemented in the regulator framework? Some
first experiments brought me into a locking hell quite fast.
Another possibility of course would be to implement this completely in
the cpufreq driver and not bother the regulator framework. Looking at
drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c the regulator handling code in there is
already complicated enough since in reality it's not one LDO but three
and we would have to add another two regulators to this driver.
For added fun ideally we want to put the LDOs in bypass mode instead of
configuring them for minimum dropout. The bypass mode doesn't work for
the 1.2GHz operating point though since the ripple on the switching
regulator gets too high. So we can't just statically configure bypass
mode but have to enable it dynamically based on the operating points.
Any ideas/input how to proceed?
Thanks
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next reply other threads:[~2015-09-25 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-25 9:07 Sascha Hauer [this message]
2015-09-25 16:47 ` Voltage setting on chained regulators, how? Mark Brown
2015-09-29 8:00 ` Sascha Hauer
2015-09-29 15:00 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150925090724.GH7858@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).