From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: System will not suspend with highest numbered CPU offline [REGRESSION][BISECTED] Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:17:55 +0530 Message-ID: <20151013034755.GS5386@linux> References: <001401d0e691$302127b0$90637710$@net> <20150908024014.GD26760@linux> <55F33D07.5090107@codeaurora.org> <2418240.peTGggLtDn@vostro.rjw.lan> <55F35092.7090207@codeaurora.org> <20151011094723.GA5386@linux> <561C0D5A.1040008@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f49.google.com ([209.85.220.49]:34811 "EHLO mail-pa0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751039AbbJMDsD (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2015 23:48:03 -0400 Received: by padhy16 with SMTP id hy16so7383351pad.1 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 20:48:03 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <561C0D5A.1040008@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Saravana Kannan Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Doug Smythies , "'Rafael J. Wysocki'" , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 12-10-15, 12:43, Saravana Kannan wrote: > Did I also convince you about allowing changing of parameters for > offline CPUs? Which would also include inactive policies? Yes, but that requires some careful modification of the code as there are various paths of the sysfs write path. And we need to see that we don't do anything more than just updating the files. So, I left it for now. -- viresh