From: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
To: "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Kapileshwar Singh <kapileshwar.singh@arm.com>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>,
"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: power_allocator: Use temperature reading from tz
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:58:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151015105812.GB2639@e104805> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36DF59CE26D8EE47B0655C516E9CE6402865B959@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 05:28:49AM +0000, Chen, Yu C wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-pm-
> > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Kapileshwar Singh
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 7:30 PM
> > To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: Kapileshwar Singh; Javi Merino; Eduardo Valentin; Daniel Kurtz; Zhang, Rui;
> > Dmitry Torokhov; Sascha Hauer; Andrea Arcangeli
> > Subject: [PATCH] thermal: power_allocator: Use temperature reading from
> > tz
> >
> > All thermal governors use the temperature value stored in struct
> > thermal_zone_device.
> >
> > thermal_zone_device->temperature
> >
> > power_allocator governor should not deviate from this and use the same.
> >
> Just my 2 cents:
> I wonder if tz->temperature would vary during power_allocator_throttle?
> because we don't have tz->lock to protect here.
True, tz->temperature could vary but I don't think it's problematic.
tz->temperature changing would mean that it doesn't pass this condition:
if (!ret && (tz->temperature < switch_on_temp)) {
and then, the temperature changes to a value below switch_on_temp
before the call to allocate_power(). allocate_power() would still
work and make an appropriate decision.
All calls inside allocate_power() are protected by tz->lock, so the
temperature used in pid_controller() is the same as the one reported
to ftrace.
In summary, I don't think it has any impact on functionality. Thanks
a lot for the review,
Javi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-15 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-13 11:30 [PATCH] thermal: power_allocator: Use temperature reading from tz Kapileshwar Singh
2015-10-14 5:28 ` Chen, Yu C
2015-10-15 10:58 ` Javi Merino [this message]
2015-11-09 11:47 ` Kapileshwar Singh
2015-11-12 18:08 ` Eduardo Valentin
2015-10-15 10:47 ` Javi Merino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151015105812.GB2639@e104805 \
--to=javi.merino@arm.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=djkurtz@chromium.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=kapileshwar.singh@arm.com \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).