From: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
To: Marc Titinger <mtitinger@baylibre.com>
Cc: khilman@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, ahaslam@baylibre.com,
bcousson@baylibre.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Marc Titinger <mtitinger+renesas@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 0/6] Managing cluser-level c-states with generic power domains
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 14:58:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151019205825.GA82426@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444141665-18534-1-git-send-email-mtitinger+renesas@baylibre.com>
Hi Marc,
I am trying to apply this on top of Axel's patches on linux-next (after
fixing issues I saw with his v9), and running to issues applying your
patches. Could you rebase on top of his v10 (he said he would send to
the ML soon) ?
Thanks,
Lina
On Tue, Oct 06 2015 at 08:27 -0600, Marc Titinger wrote:
>v2:
> - rebase on Lina Iyer's latest series
> - remove unnecessary dependency on perf-state patches from Axel Haslam
>
>-----------------------
>
>Summary
>
>1) DESCRIPTION
>2) DEPENDENCIES
>3) URL
>------------------------
>
>
>1) DESCRIPTION
>
>
> This patch set's underlying idea is that cluster-level c-states can be managed
>by the power domain, building upon Lina Iyers recent work on CPU-domain, and Axel Haslam's
>genpd multiple states. The power domain may contain CPU devices and non-CPU devices.
>
>Non-CPU Devices may expose latency constraints by registering intermediate power-states upon
>probing, for instance shallower states than the deepest cluster-off state. The generic
>power domain governor may chose a device retention state in place of the cluster-sleep
>state demanded by the menu governor, and call the platform specific handling to enter/leave
>that retention state.
>
>
>power-states
>-----------
>
>
>The proposed way how cluster-level c-states are declared as manageable by the
>power domain, rather than through the cpuidle-ops, relies on the introduction of
>"power-states", consistent with c-states. Here is an example of the DT bindings,
>the c-state CLUSTER_SLEEP_0 is exposed as a power-state in the compatible property:
>
>juno.dts: idle-states {
> entry-method = "arm,psci";
>
> CPU_SLEEP_0: cpu-sleep-0 {
> compatible = "arm,idle-state";
> arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x0010000>;
> local-timer-stop;
> entry-latency-us = <100>;
> exit-latency-us = <250>;
> min-residency-us = <2000>;
> };
>
> CLUSTER_SLEEP_0: cluster-sleep-0 {
> compatible = "arm,power-state";
> arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x1010000>;
> local-timer-stop;
> entry-latency-us = <800>;
> exit-latency-us = <700>;
> min-residency-us = <2500>;
> };
> }
>
>This will tell cpuidle runtime_put/get the CPU devices for this c-state. Eventually, the
>actual platform handlers may be called from the genpd platform ops (in place of cpuidle_ops).
>
>"drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c":
>
>static const struct of_device_id arm_idle_state_match[] __initconst = {
> {.compatible = "arm,idle-state",
> .data = arm_enter_idle_state},
> {.compatible = "arm,power-state",
> .data = arm_enter_power_state},
>};
>
>
>In case of a power-state, arm_enter_power_state will only call pm_runtime_put/get_sync
>The power doamin will handle the power off, currently this patch set lacks the final
>call to the psci interface to have a fully fonctionnal setup
>(and there are some genpd_lock'ing issues if put/get actually suspend the CPU device.)
>
>Ultimately, we would like the Power Domain's simple governor to being able to chose
>the cluster power-state based on the c-states defered to it (power-states) and constraints
>added by the devices. Consequently, we need to "soak" those power-states into the
>power-domain intermediate states from Axel. Since power-states are declared and handled
>the same manner than c-states (idle-states in DT), these patches add a soaking used when
>attaching to a genpd, where power-states are parsed from the DT into the genpd states:
>
>
>"drivers/base/power/domain.c":
>
>static const struct of_device_id power_state_match[] = {
> {.compatible = "arm,power-state",
> },
>};
>
>int of_genpd_device_parse_states(struct device_node *np,
> struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
>
>debugfs addition
>---------------
>
>To easy debug, this patch set adds a seq-file names "states" to the pm_genpd debugfs:
>
> cat /sys/kernel/debug/pm_genpd/*
>
> Domain State name Enter (ns) / Exit (ns)
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> a53_pd cluster-sleep-0 1500000 / 800000
> a57_pd cluster-sleep-0 1500000 / 800000
>
>And also a seq-file "timings", to help visualize the constrains of the non-CPU
>devices in a cluster PD.
>
> Domain Devices, Timings in ns
> Stop/Start Save/Restore, Effective
>---------------------------------------------------- ---
>a57_pd
> /cpus/cpu@0 800 /740 1320 /1720 ,0 (cached stop)
> /cpus/cpu@1 800 /740 1420 /1780 ,0 (cached stop)
> /D1 660 /580 16560 /6080 ,2199420 (cached stop)
>
>
>Device power-states
>-------------------
>
>some devices, like L2 caches, may feature a shallower retention mode, between CPU_SLEEP_0
>and CLUSTER_SLEEP_0, in which mode the L2 memory is not powered off, leading to faster
>resume than CLUSTER_SLEEP_0.
>
>One way to handle device constrains and retention features in the power-domain, is to
>allow devices to register a new power-state (consistent with a c-state).
>
>idle-states:
>
> D1_RETENTION: d1-retention {
> compatible = "arm,power-state";
> /*leave the psci param, for demo/testing:
> * the psci cpuidle driver will not currently
> * understand that a c-state shall not have it's
> * table entry with a firmware command.
> * the actual .power_on/off would be registered
> * by the DECLARE macro for a given domain*/
> arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x1010000>;
> local-timer-stop;
> entry-latency-us = <800>;
> exit-latency-us = <200>;
> min-residency-us = <2500>;
> };
>
>
> D1 {
> compatible = "fake,fake-driver";
> name = "D1";
> constraint = <30000>;
> power-domains = <&a53_pd>;
> power-states =<&D1_RETENTION>;
> };
>
>
>The genpd simple governor can now upon suspend of the last-man CPU chose a shallower
>retention state than CLUSTER_SLEEP_0.
>
>In order to achieve this, this patch set added the power-state parsing during the
>genpd_dev_pm_attach call. Multiple genpd states are now inserted in a sorted manner
>according to their depth: see pm_genpd_insert_state in "drivers/base/power/domain.c".
>
>
>
>2) DEPENDENCIES
>
> This patch set applies over linux-4.2rc5 plus the following ordered dependencies:
>
> * Ulf Hansson:
>
>6637131 New [V4] PM / Domains: Remove intermediate states from the power off sequence
>
> * Lina Iyer's patch series:
>
>7118981 Not Applicable [v2,1/7] PM / Domains: Allocate memory outside domain locks
>7118991 Not Applicable [v2,2/7] PM / Domains: Support IRQ safe PM domains
>7119001 Not Applicable [v2,3/7] drivers: cpu: Define CPU devices as IRQ safe
>7119011 Not Applicable [v2,4/7] PM / Domains: Introduce PM domains for CPUs/clusters
>7119021 Not Applicable [v2,5/7] ARM: cpuidle: Add runtime PM support for CPU idle
>7119031 Not Applicable [v2,6/7] ARM64: smp: Add runtime PM support for CPU hotplug
>7119041 Not Applicable [v2,7/7] ARM: smp: Add runtime PM support for CPU hotplug
>
> * John Medhurst:
>
>6303671 New arm64: dts: Add idle-states for Juno
>
> * Axel Haslam:
>
>6301741 Not Applicable [v7,1/5] PM / Domains: prepare for multiple states
>6301751 Not Applicable [v7,2/5] PM / Domains: core changes for multiple states
>6301781 Not Applicable [v7,3/5] PM / Domains: make governor select deepest state
>6301771 Not Applicable [v7,4/5] ARM: imx6: pm: declare pm domain latency on power_state struct.
>6301761 Not Applicable [v7,5/5] PM / Domains: remove old power on/off latencies.
>
>2) URL
>
>playable from https://github.com/mtitinger/linux-pm.git
>
>by adding the "fake driver D1" and launching the test-dev-state.sh script.
>this will show the power domain suspending to an intermediate state, based on the
>device constraints.
>
> domain status pstate slaves
> /device runtime status
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>a53_pd on
> /devices/system/cpu/cpu0 active
> /devices/system/cpu/cpu3 suspended
> /devices/system/cpu/cpu4 suspended
> /devices/system/cpu/cpu5 suspended
>a57_pd d1-retention
> /devices/system/cpu/cpu1 suspended
> /devices/system/cpu/cpu2 suspended
> /devices/platform/D1
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Marc Titinger (6):
> arm64: Juno: declare generic power domains for both clusters.
> PM / Domains: prepare for devices that might register a power state
> PM / Domains: introduce power-states consistent with c-states.
> PM / Domains: succeed & warn when attaching non-irqsafe devices to an
> irq-safe domain.
> arm: cpuidle: let genpd handle the cluster power transition with
> 'power-states'
> PM / Domains: add debugfs 'states' and 'timings' seq files
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt | 21 +-
> .../devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt | 29 ++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno.dts | 25 +-
> drivers/base/power/cpu-pd.c | 5 +
> drivers/base/power/domain.c | 415 +++++++++++++++------
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c | 52 ++-
> include/linux/pm_domain.h | 21 +-
> 7 files changed, 437 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-)
>
>--
>1.9.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-19 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-25 13:04 [RFC 0/7] Managing cluser-level c-states with generic power domains Marc Titinger
2015-09-25 13:04 ` [RFC 1/7] arm64: pm/domains: try mutualize CPU domains init between arm/arm64 Marc Titinger
2015-10-06 2:27 ` Lina Iyer
2015-10-06 8:52 ` Marc Titinger
2015-10-06 14:27 ` [RFC v2 0/6] Managing cluser-level c-states with generic power domains Marc Titinger
2015-10-06 14:27 ` [RFC v2 1/6] arm64: Juno: declare generic power domains for both clusters Marc Titinger
2015-10-06 14:27 ` [RFC v2 2/6] PM / Domains: prepare for devices that might register a power state Marc Titinger
2015-10-08 16:11 ` Lina Iyer
2015-10-09 9:39 ` Marc Titinger
2015-10-09 18:22 ` Lina Iyer
2015-10-13 10:29 ` Marc Titinger
2015-10-13 21:03 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-10-06 14:27 ` [RFC v2 3/6] PM / Domains: introduce power-states consistent with c-states Marc Titinger
2015-10-08 16:27 ` Lina Iyer
2015-10-09 10:04 ` Marc Titinger
2015-10-06 14:27 ` [RFC v2 4/6] PM / Domains: succeed & warn when attaching non-irqsafe devices to an irq-safe domain Marc Titinger
2015-10-06 14:27 ` [RFC v2 5/6] arm: cpuidle: let genpd handle the cluster power transition with 'power-states' Marc Titinger
2015-11-11 9:10 ` Zhaoyang Huang
2015-11-11 17:27 ` Lina Iyer
2015-10-06 14:27 ` [RFC v2 6/6] PM / Domains: add debugfs 'states' and 'timings' seq files Marc Titinger
2015-10-13 23:10 ` [RFC v2 0/6] Managing cluser-level c-states with generic power domains Kevin Hilman
2015-10-14 8:10 ` Axel Haslam
2015-10-19 20:58 ` Lina Iyer [this message]
2015-10-20 9:10 ` Marc Titinger
2015-10-27 17:40 ` [RFC v3 0/7] Managing cluser-level idle-states " Marc Titinger
2015-10-27 17:40 ` [RFC v3 1/7] PM / Domains: prepare for devices that might register a power state Marc Titinger
2015-10-27 17:40 ` [RFC v3 2/7] PM / Domains: support idle-states as genpd multiple-state Marc Titinger
2015-11-13 5:56 ` Zhaoyang Huang
2015-10-27 17:40 ` [RFC v3 3/7] arm64: dts: Add idle-states for Juno Marc Titinger
2015-10-27 17:40 ` [RFC v3 4/7] arm64: Juno: declare generic power domains for both clusters Marc Titinger
2015-10-27 17:40 ` [RFC v3 5/7] drivers: cpu-pd: allow calling of_cpu_pd_init from platform code Marc Titinger
2015-10-27 17:40 ` [RFC v3 6/7] arm64: PM /Domains: Initialize CPU-domains from DT Marc Titinger
2015-10-27 17:40 ` [RFC v3 7/7] arm64: Juno: declare idle-state cluster-sleep-0 as genpd state Marc Titinger
2015-09-25 13:04 ` [RFC 2/7] arm64: Juno: declare generic power domains for both clusters Marc Titinger
2015-09-25 13:04 ` [RFC 3/7] PM / Domains: prepare for devices that might register a power state Marc Titinger
2015-09-25 13:04 ` [RFC 4/7] PM / Domains: introduce power-states consistent with c-states Marc Titinger
2015-09-25 13:04 ` [RFC 5/7] PM / Domains: succeed & warn when attaching non-irqsafe devices to an irq-safe domain Marc Titinger
2015-09-25 13:04 ` [RFC 6/7] arm: cpuidle: let genpd handle the cluster power transition with 'power-states' Marc Titinger
2015-09-25 13:04 ` [RFC 7/7] PM / Domains: add debugfs 'states' and 'timings' seq files Marc Titinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151019205825.GA82426@linaro.org \
--to=lina.iyer@linaro.org \
--cc=ahaslam@baylibre.com \
--cc=bcousson@baylibre.com \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtitinger+renesas@baylibre.com \
--cc=mtitinger@baylibre.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).