From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/5] cpufreq: create cpu/cpufreq/policyX directories
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:58:49 +0530
Message-ID: <20151028082849.GE30039@ubuntu>
References: <cover.1444924623.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
 <561FFDA7.3080903@codeaurora.org>
 <20151016055118.GR19018@linux>
 <4167825.7F75u7l572@vostro.rjw.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4167825.7F75u7l572@vostro.rjw.lan>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org

On 28-10-15, 09:16, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> That's a bit too much IMO.  It means "I have carried out a detailed review
> of this patch and haven't found problems in it."  How much responsibility
> that implies is not so clear (evidently, there are differing opinions
> regarding that).

Right. I agree.

-- 
viresh