From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/5] cpufreq: ondemand: update sampling rate immediately Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 20:58:11 +0530 Message-ID: <20151028152811.GE3716@ubuntu> References: <2498053.EX0k8RstLZ@vostro.rjw.lan> <20151028093109.GJ30039@ubuntu> <3215277.8YKq8PWCpx@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.220.43]:35796 "EHLO mail-pa0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755234AbbJ1P2Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:28:16 -0400 Received: by pasz6 with SMTP id z6so10129654pas.2 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 08:28:16 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3215277.8YKq8PWCpx@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, open list On 28-10-15, 16:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Is the current code really problematic? Its not problematic, but just that I didn't like special code written here. Also, its a blocker for the next patch which tries to schedule work on all the policy->cpus together. -- viresh