From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: s3c2410: remove superfluous runtime PM calls
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 09:46:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151217094655.GV6058@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56716CC3.50309@samsung.com>
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 02:53:07PM +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 15/12/15 19:14, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Since commit 6ada5c1e1b077a ("i2c: Mark adapter devices with
> > pm_runtime_no_callbacks"), runtime PM on adapters turned into a no-op.
> > So, we can remove these calls.
>
> Won't this break i2c client devices that use runtime PM? Not sure
> if any cases of such client exist now, I'll try to find some time
> to test this change.
>
Our CODECs can be controlled over I2C and use runtime PM.
However, this change doesn't seem to have any adverse effect on
them that I can find.
Tested-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> IIRC client's pm_runtime* calls return error if their parent device's
> runtime PM is not enabled. Also enabling runtime PM on the i2c adapter
> allows propagating runtime PM calls up to its parent - the i2c
> controller platform device.
>
> So perhaps in your patch we should only remove pm_runtime_get_sync,
> pm_runtime_put calls, leaving runtime PM on the adapter enabled.
> For any future cases where the Exynos I2C controller is not in an
> always on power domain the runtime PM handling in this driver would
> need to be further reworked anyway.
>
> Perhaps we could just enable/disable adapter's runtime PM in i2c core.
>
Afraid not sure I can comment on this part.
Thanks,
Charles
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-17 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-15 18:14 [PATCH] i2c: s3c2410: remove superfluous runtime PM calls Wolfram Sang
2015-12-16 13:53 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2015-12-17 9:46 ` Charles Keepax [this message]
2015-12-19 10:52 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-12-19 10:50 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-12-19 17:05 ` Alan Stern
2015-12-19 21:57 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151217094655.GV6058@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).