From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Subject: Re: blackfin-cpufreq: How to mark cpu_set_cclk() as static?
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 15:23:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151221095308.GE5532@ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5677CB72.8090504@users.sourceforge.net>
On 21-12-15, 10:50, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> In which order would you prefer that the properties of the
> function "cpu_set_cclk" will be improved?
> * Should the linkage specifier be added on a separate source code line?
No, it can be there in the same line.
> * Can this fix be combined with my previous update suggestion for
> the return type?
I think the first patch is already Acked now and can be applied as it
is. Just send the next patch based on the previous one.
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-21 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-18 19:07 [PATCH] blackfin-cpufreq: Change return type of cpu_set_cclk() to that of clk_set_rate() SF Markus Elfring
2015-12-19 1:59 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-19 8:23 ` SF Markus Elfring
2015-12-21 3:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-21 9:20 ` blackfin-cpufreq: How to mark cpu_set_cclk() as static? SF Markus Elfring
2015-12-21 9:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-21 9:50 ` SF Markus Elfring
2015-12-21 9:53 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-12-21 10:00 ` SF Markus Elfring
2015-12-21 10:04 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-21 21:28 ` [PATCH 0/2] blackfin-cpufreq: Fine-tuning for properties of one function SF Markus Elfring
2015-12-21 21:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] blackfin-cpufreq: Change return type of cpu_set_cclk() to that of clk_set_rate() SF Markus Elfring
2015-12-21 21:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] blackfin-cpufreq: Mark cpu_set_cclk() as static SF Markus Elfring
2015-12-22 5:35 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-22 8:29 ` SF Markus Elfring
2015-12-22 8:31 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-01-03 1:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151221095308.GE5532@ubuntu \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).