linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
To: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>,
	Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>,
	Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] thermal: re-calculate k_po/k_pu when update sustainable power
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 19:17:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160106111709.GC1641@leoy-linaro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160106100712.GA2790@e104805>

Hi Javi,

On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 10:07:13AM +0000, Javi Merino wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 04:53:44PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > k_po/k_pu are two proportional term constants and essentially they have
> > fixed ratio compared with sustainable power. In current implementation,
> > k_po and k_pu are absolute value after calculation and cannot represent
> > the ratio relationship with sustainable power; as a result, when change
> > sustainable power we cannot smoothly change proportional term constant.
> 
> In v2 Daniel said that the use case was made up.  Can you elaborate on
> why we need this?

When I did IPA profiling on Hikey, I tried to set different
sustainable power. But after changed sustainable power, k_po and k_pu
were stale value which calculated by old sustainable power.

So with this patch, it's more convinence for profiling and can avoid
confusion for k_po/k_pu after update sustainable power.

> > So this patch series introduces k_po_ratio and k_pu_ratio, which
> > represent the ratio value compared against sustainable power. Also add
> > sys file system nodes for them for easily update them from userspace and
> > update a bit in documentation.
> 
> Actually, it makes it harder to update from userspace.  Now userspace
> can't set a k_po/k_pu any more, and it's forced to set them as ratios
> of sustainable power. I'd rather not do this unless there is a good
> reason for it.

We use ratios of sustainable power to calculate k_po/k_pu, so if user
explicitly specify ratio values we can easily to update k_po/k_pu
after we change sustainable power.

Otherwise, it's hard to get to know the real ratio values of
sustainable power. Please review below case:

- If we set new sustainable power, then actually in kernel it should
  update k_po/k_pu so that can keep fixed ration;
- At the meantime, user can set k_po/k_pu from sys file node so that
  eventually change ratio;

So here has race condition with updating k_po/k_pu and the code is
hard to distinguish what is real real ratio. If have explicit parameters
for ratios, then will be much clear.

Thanks,
Leo Yan

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-06 11:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-06  8:53 [PATCH v3 0/4] thermal: re-calculate k_po/k_pu when update sustainable power Leo Yan
2016-01-06  8:53 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] thermal: power_allocator: rework proportional parameter Leo Yan
2016-01-06  8:53 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] thermal: power_allocator: change k_pu_ratio/k_po_ratio as percentage Leo Yan
2016-01-06  8:53 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] thermal: add sys node for k_pu_ratio/k_po_ratio Leo Yan
2016-01-06  8:53 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] thermal: power_allocator: document k_pu_ratio/k_po_ratio Leo Yan
2016-01-06 10:07 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] thermal: re-calculate k_po/k_pu when update sustainable power Javi Merino
2016-01-06 11:17   ` Leo Yan [this message]
2016-01-06 11:21   ` Daniel Thompson
2016-01-06 15:05     ` Javi Merino

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160106111709.GC1641@leoy-linaro \
    --to=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=djkurtz@chromium.org \
    --cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
    --cc=javi.merino@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=punit.agrawal@arm.com \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).