From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/17] cpufreq: dt: Pass regulator name to the OPP core for V1 bindings Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 17:53:29 -0800 Message-ID: <20160112015328.GQ22188@codeaurora.org> References: <981905b802879bff26d839b0aab19ad67a3aa1ff.1450777582.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:43259 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761751AbcALBxb (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2016 20:53:31 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <981905b802879bff26d839b0aab19ad67a3aa1ff.1450777582.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Rafael Wysocki , linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, nm@ti.com On 12/22, Viresh Kumar wrote: > OPP core can handle the regulators by itself, and it allocates the > regulator based on device's name. But for older V1 bindings, many DT > files have used names like 'cpu-supply' instead of 'cpu0-supply'. > > The cpufreq-dt driver needs to tell the right name of the regulator in > this case to the OPP core. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar This whole patch is confusing to me because old style was to be cpu0-supply, and new style is cpu-supply. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project