From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/19] cpufreq: assert policy->rwsem is held in cpufreq_set_policy Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 15:45:01 +0530 Message-ID: <20160112101501.GB1084@ubuntu> References: <1452533760-13787-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com> <1452533760-13787-11-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1452533760-13787-11-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Juri Lelli Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, mturquette@baylibre.com, steve.muckle@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 11-01-16, 17:35, Juri Lelli wrote: > Since cpufreq_set_policy is modifying policy, it has to work under policy-> > rwsem protection. > > Assert such condition. > > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" > Cc: Viresh Kumar > Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) Acked-by: Viresh Kumar -- viresh