From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, edubezval@gmail.com,
grygorii.strashko@ti.com, nm@ti.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, joel@jms.id.au,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
peterz@infradead.org, dyoung@redhat.com, josh@joshtriplett.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] reboot: Backup orderly_poweroff
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:05:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160114090520.GA4351@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452688405-15087-1-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com>
* Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> wrote:
> orderly_poweroff is triggered when a graceful shutdown
> of system is desired. This may be used in many critical states of the
> kernel such as when subsystems detects conditions such as critical
> temperature conditions. However, in certain conditions in system
> boot up sequences like those in the middle of driver probes being
> initiated, userspace will be unable to power off the system in a clean
> manner and leaves the system in a critical state. In cases like these,
> the /sbin/poweroff will return success (having forked off to attempt
> powering off the system. However, the system overall will fail to
> completely poweroff (since other modules will be probed) and the system
> is still functional with no userspace (since that would have shut itself
> off).
>
> However, there is no clean way of detecting such failure of userspace
> powering off the system. In such scenarios, it is necessary for a backup
> workqueue to be able to force a shutdown of the system when orderly
> shutdown is not successful after a configurable time period.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
> Suggested-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> ---
> Links to previous discussion can be found here:
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg124925.html
>
> Boot tested on DRA7.
>
> changes in v2:
>
> * Changed #ifdef to #if CONFIG_SHUTDOWN_BACKUP_DELAY_MS
>
> arch/Kconfig | 7 +++++++
> kernel/reboot.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux/arch/Kconfig
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/arch/Kconfig 2016-01-11 15:26:07.732173131 +0530
> +++ linux/arch/Kconfig 2016-01-11 15:26:07.728173205 +0530
> @@ -37,6 +37,18 @@
> def_bool y
> depends on PERF_EVENTS && HAVE_PERF_EVENTS_NMI && !PPC64
>
> +config SHUTDOWN_BACKUP_DELAY_MS
> + int "Backup shutdown delay in milli-seconds"
> + default 0
> + help
> + The number of milliseconds to delay before backup workqueue
> + executes attempting to poweroff the system after the
> + orderly_poweroff function has failed to complete.
> +
> + If set to 0, the backup workqueue is not active. The value
> + should be conservatively configured based on userspace latencies
> + expected for a given system.
I don't really understand this. In what circumstances can a reboot fail?
I think that is what should be fixed: a reboot should never fail, instead of
introducing some sort of fragile timeout based method.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-14 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-13 12:33 [PATCH v2] reboot: Backup orderly_poweroff Keerthy
2016-01-14 9:05 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2016-01-14 9:18 ` Keerthy
2016-01-14 10:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-01-14 10:42 ` Keerthy
2016-01-14 11:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-01-14 13:25 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2016-01-15 10:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-01-15 13:29 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-01-15 14:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-01-19 9:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-01-19 10:32 ` Keerthy
2016-01-14 14:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-01-15 10:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-01-15 11:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160114090520.GA4351@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=j-keerthy@ti.com \
--cc=joel@jms.id.au \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).