From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpuidle optimizations (on top of linux-next)
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 08:28:11 +0100
Message-ID: <20160119072811.GA11346@gmail.com>
References: <1621492.NI2xz9vt7M@vostro.rjw.lan>
 <569CEC86.5080002@arm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:34517 "EHLO
	mail-wm0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751409AbcASH2R (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 19 Jan 2016 02:28:17 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <569CEC86.5080002@arm.com>
Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>


* Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:

> On 15/01/16 23:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >When I was looking at the cpuidle code after the Sudeeps's problem report,
> >it occured to me that we had some pointless overhead there, so two
> >changes to reduce it follow.
> >
> >[1/2] Make the fallback to to default_idle_call() in call_cpuidle()
> >       unnecessary and drop it.
> >[2/2] Make menu_select() avoid checking states that don't need to
> >       (or even shouldn't) be checked when making the selection.
> >
> 
> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

Rafael, can I pick these up into the scheduler tree?

Thanks,

	Ingo