From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [RFC V2 1/2] irq: Add a framework to measure interrupt timings Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 11:15:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20160122101511.GP6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1453305636-22156-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <1453305636-22156-2-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <20160120190718.GS6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <56A0A9E3.2070306@linaro.org> <56A0E8F1.7010409@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:56883 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751899AbcAVKPQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2016 05:15:16 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Daniel Lezcano , rafael@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nicolas.pitre@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 07:56:36PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > We really should ignore that sillyness and if people complain, make them > complain to their HW vendor. That's the only way this crap will go away. > > If we just keep on supporting this completely pointless nonsense the HW folks > will just not fix it. > > We've been successful in the past to 'educate' hw people by making features > not available for mindless designs. > > In this case we still support the feature, but it might be suboptimal. The > real interesting ports on that platform are MSI anyway, so I really couldn't > care less. I'm fine with not supporting shared interrupts, as long as the thing is consistent.