From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 11/19] cpufreq: assert policy->rwsem is held in __cpufreq_governor Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 12:06:02 +0530 Message-ID: <20160202063602.GG31828@vireshk> References: <1452533760-13787-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com> <20160112102025.GC1084@ubuntu> <56AC04E3.8090900@codeaurora.org> <1703921.2AHaiQoggk@vostro.rjw.lan> <20160201060943.GH13476@vireshk> <56AFBEE5.70501@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Saravana Kannan , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Juri Lelli , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Peter Zijlstra , Michael Turquette , Steve Muckle , Vincent Guittot , Morten Rasmussen , dietmar.eggemann@arm.com List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 01-02-16, 22:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > I'm not sure what you mean by "the sysfs lock" here? The policy rwsem > or something else? He perhaps referred to the s_active.lock that we see in traces. -- viresh