From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] cpufreq: powernv: Redesign the presentation of
 throttle notification and solve bug-fixes in the driver
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 19:31:57 +0530
Message-ID: <20160203140157.GF3469@vireshk>
References: <1454442102-1229-1-git-send-email-shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <CAJZ5v0g28Px=KPa3uCW86w+u35CKkHd7rCrbTfxDjKHmcBuOEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0g28Px=KPa3uCW86w+u35CKkHd7rCrbTfxDjKHmcBuOEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, pc@us.ibm.com, anton@samba.org, ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bsingharora@gmail.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au
List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org

On 03-02-16, 14:40, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> It looks like patches [1-5/6] are not objectionable and I can apply
> them without the last one if you want me to.

Looks fine to me.

-- 
viresh