From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/10] cpufreq: governor: Drop cpu argument from dbs_check_cpu() Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 15:02:38 +0530 Message-ID: <20160207093238.GD19059@vireshk> References: <3705929.bslqXH980s@vostro.rjw.lan> <9008098.QDD8C89zDx@vostro.rjw.lan> <2367498.ClbHvSsNAg@vostro.rjw.lan> <3908268.r5qEEZP0qG@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f178.google.com ([209.85.192.178]:34668 "EHLO mail-pf0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753453AbcBGJcm (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Feb 2016 04:32:42 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f178.google.com with SMTP id o185so93492114pfb.1 for ; Sun, 07 Feb 2016 01:32:42 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3908268.r5qEEZP0qG@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux PM list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Srinivas Pandruvada , Juri Lelli , Steve Muckle , Saravana Kannan On 06-02-16, 13:50, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Since policy->cpu is always passed as the second argument to > dbs_check_cpu(), it is not really necessary to pass it, because > the function can obtain that value via its first argument just fine. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > --- > > Changes from v2: > - Rebase on top of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8241231/ > and on the v3 of [8/10] without [9/10]. Acked-by: Viresh Kumar -- viresh