From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Add cpufreq support Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 17:52:12 +0530 Message-ID: <20160207122212.GA3808@vireshk> References: <56B4D4BE.2040008@free.fr> <3308645.nrPBoahQ2V@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f49.google.com ([209.85.220.49]:35302 "EHLO mail-pa0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751394AbcBGMWS (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Feb 2016 07:22:18 -0500 Received: by mail-pa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id ho8so59143132pac.2 for ; Sun, 07 Feb 2016 04:22:17 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3308645.nrPBoahQ2V@wuerfel> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Mason , linux-pm On 05-02-16, 23:24, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > We no longer call platform_device_register_simple() from platform code, at least > for new platforms, and we should probably remove the code from the existing > platforms that still do it. I forget what the replacement was, but I'm not > going to take this version. Viresh should be able to help you do it the right > way. We thought initially that opp-v2's compatible string can be used to probe the drivers, but that was denied later and all we do today is add platform devices for cpufreq. What do you have in mind Arnd ? -- viresh