From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] cpufreq: governor: Simplify gov_cancel_work() slightly
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:10:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160215054035.GB6334@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1696919.WxyrSFSFde@vostro.rjw.lan>
On 15-02-16, 02:12, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> The atomic work counter incrementation in gov_cancel_work() is not
> necessary any more, because work items won't be queued up after
> gov_clear_update_util() anyway, so drop it along with the comment
> about how it may be missed by the gov_clear_update_util().
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>
> This is a new version of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8291021/ .
>
> Changes from the previous version:
> - Rebase.
>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 8 --------
> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> @@ -300,13 +300,6 @@ static void gov_cancel_work(struct cpufr
> {
> struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data;
>
> - /* Tell dbs_update_util_handler() to skip queuing up work items. */
> - atomic_inc(&policy_dbs->work_count);
> - /*
> - * If dbs_update_util_handler() is already running, it may not notice
> - * the incremented work_count, so wait for it to complete to prevent its
> - * work item from being queued up after the cancel_work_sync() below.
> - */
> gov_clear_update_util(policy_dbs->policy);
> irq_work_sync(&policy_dbs->irq_work);
> cancel_work_sync(&policy_dbs->work);
> @@ -369,7 +362,6 @@ static void dbs_update_util_handler(stru
> * The work may not be allowed to be queued up right now.
> * Possible reasons:
> * - Work has already been queued up or is in progress.
> - * - The governor is being stopped.
> * - It is too early (too little time from the previous sample).
> */
> if (atomic_inc_return(&policy_dbs->work_count) == 1) {
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-15 5:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-15 1:08 [PATCH 0/9] cpufreq governor improvements Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 1:12 ` [PATCH 1/9] cpufreq: governor: Simplify gov_cancel_work() slightly Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 5:40 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2016-02-15 1:13 ` [PATCH 2/9] cpufreq: governor: Avoid atomic operations in hot paths Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 6:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-15 8:20 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-15 1:15 ` [PATCH 3/9] cpufreq: governor: Fix nice contribution computation in dbs_check_cpu() Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 8:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-15 1:18 ` [PATCH 4/9] cpufreq: governor: Clean up load-related computations Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 8:33 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-15 1:19 ` [PATCH 5/9] cpufreq: governor: Get rid of the ->gov_check_cpu callback Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 8:52 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-15 1:20 ` [PATCH 6/9] cpufreq: governor: Reset sample delay in store_sampling_rate() Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 8:53 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-15 1:20 ` [PATCH 7/9] cpufreq: governor: Move rate_mult to struct policy_dbs Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 8:56 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-15 1:21 ` [PATCH 8/9] cpufreq: ondemand: Simplify conditionals in od_dbs_timer() Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 8:57 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-15 1:22 ` [PATCH 9/9] cpufreq: governor: Use microseconds in sample delay computations Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 8:58 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160215054035.GB6334@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox