From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] cpufreq: governor: Avoid atomic operations in hot paths
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:47:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160215061710.GC6334@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8782327.qY15U8QUIT@vostro.rjw.lan>
On 15-02-16, 02:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> static void dbs_irq_work(struct irq_work *irq_work)
> @@ -357,6 +360,7 @@ static void dbs_update_util_handler(stru
> {
> struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = container_of(data, struct cpu_dbs_info, update_util);
> struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = cdbs->policy_dbs;
> + u64 delta_ns;
>
> /*
> * The work may not be allowed to be queued up right now.
> @@ -364,17 +368,30 @@ static void dbs_update_util_handler(stru
> * - Work has already been queued up or is in progress.
> * - It is too early (too little time from the previous sample).
> */
> - if (atomic_inc_return(&policy_dbs->work_count) == 1) {
> - u64 delta_ns;
> + if (policy_dbs->work_in_progress)
> + return;
>
> - delta_ns = time - policy_dbs->last_sample_time;
> - if ((s64)delta_ns >= policy_dbs->sample_delay_ns) {
> - policy_dbs->last_sample_time = time;
> - gov_queue_irq_work(policy_dbs);
> - return;
> - }
> - }
> - atomic_dec(&policy_dbs->work_count);
> + /*
> + * If the reads below are reordered before the check above, the value
> + * of sample_delay_ns used in the computation may be stale.
> + */
> + smp_rmb();
> + delta_ns = time - policy_dbs->last_sample_time;
> + if ((s64)delta_ns < policy_dbs->sample_delay_ns)
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * If the policy is not shared, the irq_work may be queued up right away
> + * at this point. Otherwise, we need to ensure that only one of the
> + * CPUs sharing the policy will do that.
> + */
> + if (policy_dbs->is_shared &&
> + !atomic_add_unless(&policy_dbs->work_count, 1, 1))
> + return;
> +
> + policy_dbs->last_sample_time = time;
> + policy_dbs->work_in_progress = true;
> + gov_queue_irq_work(policy_dbs);
> }
>
> static struct policy_dbs_info *alloc_policy_dbs_info(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> @@ -551,6 +568,8 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct
> if (!policy->cur)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + policy_dbs->is_shared = policy_is_shared(policy);
> +
> sampling_rate = dbs_data->sampling_rate;
> ignore_nice = dbs_data->ignore_nice_load;
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
> @@ -130,6 +130,9 @@ struct policy_dbs_info {
> /* dbs_data may be shared between multiple policy objects */
> struct dbs_data *dbs_data;
> struct list_head list;
> + /* Status indicators */
> + bool is_shared; /* This object is used by multiple CPUs */
> + bool work_in_progress; /* Work is being queued up or in progress */
> };
>
> static inline void gov_update_sample_delay(struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs,
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-15 6:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-15 1:08 [PATCH 0/9] cpufreq governor improvements Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 1:12 ` [PATCH 1/9] cpufreq: governor: Simplify gov_cancel_work() slightly Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 5:40 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-15 1:13 ` [PATCH 2/9] cpufreq: governor: Avoid atomic operations in hot paths Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 6:17 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2016-02-15 8:20 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-15 1:15 ` [PATCH 3/9] cpufreq: governor: Fix nice contribution computation in dbs_check_cpu() Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 8:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-15 1:18 ` [PATCH 4/9] cpufreq: governor: Clean up load-related computations Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 8:33 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-15 1:19 ` [PATCH 5/9] cpufreq: governor: Get rid of the ->gov_check_cpu callback Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 8:52 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-15 1:20 ` [PATCH 6/9] cpufreq: governor: Reset sample delay in store_sampling_rate() Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 8:53 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-15 1:20 ` [PATCH 7/9] cpufreq: governor: Move rate_mult to struct policy_dbs Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 8:56 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-15 1:21 ` [PATCH 8/9] cpufreq: ondemand: Simplify conditionals in od_dbs_timer() Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 8:57 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-15 1:22 ` [PATCH 9/9] cpufreq: governor: Use microseconds in sample delay computations Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-15 8:58 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160215061710.GC6334@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).