From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: Crashes in arm qemu emulations due to 'cpufreq: governor: Replace timers with utilization ...' Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 07:06:28 +0530 Message-ID: <20160216013628.GK6334@vireshk-i7> References: <20160215170527.GA24453@roeck-us.net> <20160216011335.GI6334@vireshk-i7> <6826860.yxabWEoz5T@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f177.google.com ([209.85.192.177]:34598 "EHLO mail-pf0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751731AbcBPBgi (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Feb 2016 20:36:38 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f177.google.com with SMTP id x65so95594175pfb.1 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:36:38 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6826860.yxabWEoz5T@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Guenter Roeck , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Peter Zijlstra On 16-02-16, 02:27, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Yes, that's what we should be doing, but it seemed to me that we didn't. > > Or maybe the trace just contained the last one, because that's when the > crash happened. Ofcourse, it wouldn't mention the function calls that have already finished :) -- viresh