From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jacob Pan Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:04:04 -0800 Message-ID: <20160217100404.5a59649a@icelake> References: <1452884653-10560-1-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> <4100978.ozoN0XeYQl@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Peter Zijlstra , LKML , Linux PM , Rafael Wysocki , Srinivas Pandruvada , jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:04:41 +0100 (CET) Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > > for_each_online_cpu(i) { > > > if (topology_physical_package_id(i) == > > > package_id) > > This is still crap. We really want a proper handling for that which > does not require these silly for_each_cpu() loops. > > That code already has a hotplug notifier, so you can track one online > cpu in the package like we do in cqm and other facilities. > > The first online cpu of a package sets itself as 'owner'. On unplug > it looks up: > > rpl->cpu = cpumask_any_but(topology_core_cpumask(cpu), cpu); > > So if this is the last cpu then rpl->cpu becomes nr_cpu_ids. > > So that whole nonsense can be avoided completely. ok, that would work nicely, similar to cqm_pick_event_reader(). thanks for the tip. just fyi, unlike perf cqm, rapl runtime change is expected to be low frequency.