public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] cpufreq: governor: Narrow down the dbs_data_mutex coverage
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:08:14 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160219023814.GD16983@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2559441.qfMQ0Nj7fb@vostro.rjw.lan>

On 18-02-16, 18:58, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Narrow down the dbs_data_mutex coverage
> 
> Since cpufreq_governor_dbs() is now always called with policy->rwsem
> held, it cannot be executed twice in parallel for the same policy.
> Thus it is not necessary to hold dbs_data_mutex around the invocations
> of cpufreq_governor_start/stop/limits() from it as those functions
> never modify any data that can be shared between different policies.
> 
> However, cpufreq_governor_dbs() may be executed twice in parallal
> for different policies using the same gov->gdbs_data object and
> dbs_data_mutex is still necessary to protect that object against
> concurrent updates.
> 
> For this reason, narrow down the dbs_data_mutex locking to
> cpufreq_governor_init/exit() where it is needed and rename the
> mutex to gov_dbs_data_mutex to reflect its purpose.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c |   46 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh

      reply	other threads:[~2016-02-19  2:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-18  1:17 [PATCH 0/12] cpufreq: More governor code reorganization Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  1:19 ` [PATCH 1/12] cpufreq: governor: Close dbs_data update race condition Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  5:24   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18 16:20     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-19  2:27       ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-19  2:34         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-19  3:09   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18  1:20 ` [PATCH 2/12] cpufreq: governor: Move io_is_busy to struct dbs_data Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  5:28   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18  1:21 ` [PATCH 3/12] cpufreq: governor: Add a ->start callback for governors Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  5:36   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18  1:22 ` [PATCH 4/12] cpufreq: governor: Drop unused governor callback and data fields Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  5:37   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18  1:24 ` [PATCH 5/12] cpufreq: ondemand: Drop one more callback from struct od_ops Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  5:38   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18  1:26 ` [PATCH 6/12] cpufreq: governor: Fix CPU load information updates via ->store Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  5:44   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18 17:37     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  1:28 ` [PATCH 7/12] cpufreq: ondemand: Rework the handling of powersave bias updates Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  5:53   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18  1:30 ` [PATCH 8/12] cpufreq: governor: Make governor private data per-policy Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  6:03   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18 17:56     ` [PATCH v2 " Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-19  2:36       ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18  1:31 ` [PATCH 9/12] cpufreq: governor: Move per-CPU data to the common code Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  6:08   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18  1:32 ` [PATCH 10/12] cpufreq: governor: Relocate definitions of tuners structures Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  6:09   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18 17:57     ` [PATCH v2 " Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-19  2:36       ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18  1:33 ` [PATCH 11/12] cpufreq: governor: Make dbs_data_mutex static Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  6:09   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18  1:38 ` [PATCH 12/12] cpufreq: governor: Narrow down the dbs_data_mutex coverage Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18  6:20   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-02-18 16:32     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18 17:58     ` [PATCH v2 " Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-19  2:38       ` Viresh Kumar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160219023814.GD16983@vireshk-i7 \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox