Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: simplify for_each_suitable_policy() macro
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:03:15 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160222053315.GE28226@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1456080792-22770-1-git-send-email-ebiggers3@gmail.com>

On 21-02-16, 12:53, Eric Biggers wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 44 +++-----------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index e979ec7..3aa7b2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -38,48 +38,10 @@ static inline bool policy_is_inactive(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  	return cpumask_empty(policy->cpus);
>  }
>  
> -static bool suitable_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, bool active)
> -{
> -	return active == !policy_is_inactive(policy);
> -}
> -
> -/* Finds Next Acive/Inactive policy */
> -static struct cpufreq_policy *next_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> -					  bool active)
> -{
> -	do {
> -		/* No more policies in the list */
> -		if (list_is_last(&policy->policy_list, &cpufreq_policy_list))
> -			return NULL;
> -
> -		policy = list_next_entry(policy, policy_list);
> -	} while (!suitable_policy(policy, active));
> -
> -	return policy;
> -}
> -
> -static struct cpufreq_policy *first_policy(bool active)
> -{
> -	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
> -
> -	/* No policies in the list */
> -	if (list_empty(&cpufreq_policy_list))
> -		return NULL;
> -
> -	policy = list_first_entry(&cpufreq_policy_list, typeof(*policy),
> -				  policy_list);
> -
> -	if (!suitable_policy(policy, active))
> -		policy = next_policy(policy, active);
> -
> -	return policy;
> -}
> -
>  /* Macros to iterate over CPU policies */
> -#define for_each_suitable_policy(__policy, __active)	\
> -	for (__policy = first_policy(__active);		\
> -	     __policy;					\
> -	     __policy = next_policy(__policy, __active))
> +#define for_each_suitable_policy(__policy, __active)			 \
> +	list_for_each_entry(__policy, &cpufreq_policy_list, policy_list) \
> +		if ((__active) == !policy_is_inactive(__policy))
>  
>  #define for_each_active_policy(__policy)		\
>  	for_each_suitable_policy(__policy, true)

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-22  5:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-21 18:53 [PATCH] cpufreq: simplify for_each_suitable_policy() macro Eric Biggers
2016-02-22  5:33 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2016-02-22 13:15   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160222053315.GE28226@vireshk-i7 \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=ebiggers3@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox