linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Thermal governors non-modularity
@ 2016-02-20 13:04 Jean Delvare
  2016-02-22  7:06 ` Zhang, Rui
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2016-02-20 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-pm; +Cc: Zhang Rui, Eduardo Valentin

Hi Rui, Eduardo,

Is there any fundamental reason why thermal governors can't be built as
modules? We have more and more of them, 5 now, and the most recent is
fairly big... Would be much more practical if they could be built as
modules and loaded at run-time only as needed.

Thanks,
-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* RE: Thermal governors non-modularity
  2016-02-20 13:04 Thermal governors non-modularity Jean Delvare
@ 2016-02-22  7:06 ` Zhang, Rui
  2016-02-22 18:56   ` Eduardo Valentin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Zhang, Rui @ 2016-02-22  7:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jean Delvare, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; +Cc: Eduardo Valentin

I tried to use them as module in the first place, but failed for some reason. I cannot recall the root cause, but I will try to check this and reply to you later. :)

Thanks,
rui

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean Delvare [mailto:jdelvare@suse.de]
> Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2016 9:05 PM
> To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Zhang, Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>; Eduardo Valentin
> <edubezval@gmail.com>
> Subject: Thermal governors non-modularity
> Importance: High
> 
> Hi Rui, Eduardo,
> 
> Is there any fundamental reason why thermal governors can't be built as
> modules? We have more and more of them, 5 now, and the most recent is
> fairly big... Would be much more practical if they could be built as modules
> and loaded at run-time only as needed.
> 
> Thanks,
> --
> Jean Delvare
> SUSE L3 Support

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Thermal governors non-modularity
  2016-02-22  7:06 ` Zhang, Rui
@ 2016-02-22 18:56   ` Eduardo Valentin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eduardo Valentin @ 2016-02-22 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zhang, Rui; +Cc: Jean Delvare, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1225 bytes --]

Hello

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 07:06:17AM +0000, Zhang, Rui wrote:
> I tried to use them as module in the first place, but failed for some reason. I cannot recall the root cause, but I will try to check this and reply to you later. :)
> 

Yeah, there was bug in the boot sequencing that would leave fans on all
the time. Then you decided to make everything builtin:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=136085598604095&w=2



> Thanks,
> rui
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jean Delvare [mailto:jdelvare@suse.de]
> > Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2016 9:05 PM
> > To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: Zhang, Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>; Eduardo Valentin
> > <edubezval@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Thermal governors non-modularity
> > Importance: High
> > 
> > Hi Rui, Eduardo,
> > 
> > Is there any fundamental reason why thermal governors can't be built as
> > modules? We have more and more of them, 5 now, and the most recent is
> > fairly big... Would be much more practical if they could be built as modules
> > and loaded at run-time only as needed.

I agree here. We just to make sure we don't regress here.

BR,

> > 
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > Jean Delvare
> > SUSE L3 Support

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-22 18:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-02-20 13:04 Thermal governors non-modularity Jean Delvare
2016-02-22  7:06 ` Zhang, Rui
2016-02-22 18:56   ` Eduardo Valentin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).