From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Reichel Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/2] power: act8945a: add charger driver for the sub-device of ACT8945A MFD Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 19:17:27 +0100 Message-ID: <20160224181727.GA19106@earth> References: <1455524524-9359-1-git-send-email-wenyou.yang@atmel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+" Return-path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:36533 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753683AbcBXSRc (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:17:32 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Yang, Wenyou" Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov , David Woodhouse , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Brown , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Javier Martinez Canillas , Lee Jones , Peter Korsgaard , "Ferre, Nicolas" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:33:13AM +0000, Yang, Wenyou wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wenyou Yang [mailto:wenyou.yang@atmel.com] > > Sent: 2016=E5=B9=B42=E6=9C=8815=E6=97=A5 16:22 > > To: Sebastian Reichel ; Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > > ; David Woodhouse ; Rob > > Herring ; Pawel Moll ; Mark Bro= wn > > ; Ian Campbell ; Kum= ar > > Gala > > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski ; Javier Martinez Cani= llas > > ; Lee Jones ; Peter Korsgaard > > ; Ferre, Nicolas ; linux-arm- > > kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux- > > pm@vger.kernel.org; Yang, Wenyou > > Subject: [PATCH v9 0/2] power: act8945a: add charger driver for the sub= -device > > of ACT8945A MFD > >=20 > > The ACT8945A is a Multi Function Device with the following subdevices: > > - Regulator > > - Charger >=20 > I would like to know if this patch set is okay to apply. > Or any comments? No comments, I just queued it with "|| COMPILE_TEST" dependency added. -- Sebastian --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWzfO3AAoJENju1/PIO/qadikQAKHipmyxC1J0ZC39Umd6udU9 s61s415DQN/yRJIdGkEbj6NkespKzus9hYLSene52QWvhLERMduIG2p36g+JOveF 2xhqLyMDwGMidlnzDrDmB91WprtZAchjzQxe/CNWyvwbbzPGcfP92nNqONtv6iFt 9pgz7oUohwq/Iu78clWe2MHy8diVsNUGMgE3z2L7ZjsZhFkzChy6nnLiTT7lDN2M 4G5NoCea389KG+ASFobXKnvVIlJSXv2jdLqVUJzmMgmVoexokF4mJGk4qUAJoUvw oF62WFHitzF/f6zXl7EeULHTIyKZhhWkzwZyh3o2LigXqQ4+fqlDuNeBeBvoDEEb zs4K7oASMQNlcu7zgpbbX9t+9caVjLEBCR1lDaTOvHooph65PzL4sRk6P0i8CXt1 pSfmVjerlhHFIV34z2RnLt7KHA0pcJ9Z9FNpEaaMN0XskvmTdTUbw/De9+qV6sH4 akk97/iqyr8M2NjTDF4j9FlRiXwhOYCTf+eIdmv53ikrNYtT8JtogsAHmJKzpDYD s2bRsXOoor0MDi8MBkkBjJw9fGKlflBgrZsyPb9G7Yu2nKNKTTVQdnpKWzXa+hHw eCSZk75BQ662llnfxCoEu/ApWXKiyrSiWzQBOsKGp0ngO/xBcD8zD5Q4pK0fF2WM +A9VxsRNwKja6G8lbDqN =9wf+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+--