From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] PM / OPP: Add 'supply-names' binding Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 15:58:31 +0530 Message-ID: <20160302102831.GE2891@vireshk-i7> References: <2b87b162eabd1570ae2311e1ef8655acda72f678.1441972771.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <55F72C97.2030306@kernel.org> <20160302025016.GS18327@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f170.google.com ([209.85.192.170]:35996 "EHLO mail-pf0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754286AbcCBK2m (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2016 05:28:42 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 63so2365935pfe.3 for ; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 02:28:42 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160302025016.GS18327@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Rob Herring , Nishanth Menon , Stephen Boyd , Dave Gerlach , Rafael Wysocki , Linaro Kernel Mailman List , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Rob Herring On 02-03-16, 11:50, Mark Brown wrote: > Please don't take things off-list unless there is a really strong reason > to do so. Sending things to the list ensures that everyone gets a > chance to read and comment on things. Okay. I thought keeping that on linux-pm would be sufficient for interested folks to follow. > I'm really not sure what I can say here that I've not already said > repeatedly, what's new here? Yeah, you have raised some genuine concerns earlier, like the sequence in which the voltages of multiple supplies should be changed, and if we should rely on some DT sequence for that. I started it again, because we have a real case now (not like the virtual case earlier) where a platform has multiple supplies for a device (CPU). I just wanted to hear from all of you on how should we go ahead and solve it. TI guys had some crazy ideas, like using OPP-notifiers to update the second regulator, etc and I really hated it :) -- viresh