From: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
To: "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
"linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC,v4] ACPI / PM: Introduce efi poweroff for HW-full platforms without _S5
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 20:00:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160314200033.GG2619@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36DF59CE26D8EE47B0655C516E9CE640286D442A@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On Fri, 11 Mar, at 04:33:46PM, Chen, Yu C wrote:
>
> There is a future Base-IA platform, we are planning to skip
> implementing the SLP_TYP register and the S5 object. (already there
> will be no S3 and no S4)
Cool. This is really valuable information that should go into the
commit message.
Because if this is the rationale for the change, I don't see why we'd
need to provide the default stuff. Instead we should just enforce EFI
reboot, and only add the pm_poweroff_default hook if there is an
explicit user in the future, IMO.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-14 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-11 9:05 [PATCH][RFC,v4] ACPI / PM: Introduce efi poweroff for HW-full platforms without _S5 Chen Yu
2016-03-11 15:55 ` Matt Fleming
2016-03-11 16:33 ` Chen, Yu C
2016-03-14 20:00 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2016-03-16 5:59 ` Chen, Yu C
2016-03-17 14:39 ` Matt Fleming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160314200033.GG2619@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--to=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).