Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Do not schedule policy update work in cpufreq_resume()

[Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>]

On 16-03-16, 13:29, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:52 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> > Not just that. We wouldn't call syscore-ops for the boot-cpu. It never went
> > away.
> 
> Yes, we would.
> 
> We actually call syscore ops *only* on that CPU.

Ahh, I thought you are talking about subsys-callbacks which we use while
registering cpufreq drivers.

> >> Still, though, the way it is done now is really awful and has to go.
> >>
> >> I guess something along the lines of cpufreq_update_policy() might be
> >> done in cpufreq_resume() before governors are started, but it might
> >> even be better to set policy->cur from scratch when starting the
> >> governors.  Just do driver->get() and set policy->cur to what that
> >> returns (or just use the average of min and max if ->get is not
> >> available).  And that unconditionally, regardless of the reason why
> >> the governors are started.
> >
> > I think doing it from a somewhat centric location would make more sense then
> > pushing this for the governors.
> 
> I'm not talking about doing that in governors, but in
> cpufreq_governor() when the event is _START.

Yeah, that shall be fine.

-- 
viresh