From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: cpufreq_resume warning issue Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:04:22 +0530 Message-ID: <20160321083422.GE1803@vireshk-i7> References: <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED0A6D8624@SZXEMA509-MBX.china.huawei.com> <20160321073228.GC1803@vireshk-i7> <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED0A6D96C7@SZXEMA509-MBX.china.huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f178.google.com ([209.85.192.178]:33347 "EHLO mail-pf0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751067AbcCUIe0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2016 04:34:26 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f178.google.com with SMTP id 4so125849543pfd.0 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 01:34:26 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED0A6D96C7@SZXEMA509-MBX.china.huawei.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Zengtao (B)" Cc: "rjw@rjwysocki.net" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" On 21-03-16, 08:05, Zengtao (B) wrote: > > Why doesn't you have DVFS for both the cores ? > > > The CPU0 is low power, not so much benefit from dvfs, so we just design one power-domain for CPU1 to cost down. What CPU is that ? A7? -- viresh