linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH][v5] ACPI / PM: Introduce efi poweroff for HW-full platforms without _S5
@ 2016-03-20 14:31 Chen Yu
       [not found] ` <1458484268-18311-1-git-send-email-yu.c.chen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chen Yu @ 2016-03-20 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Rafael J. Wysocki,
	Matt Fleming
  Cc: linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A,
	Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Len Brown, Chen Yu

The problem is Linux registers pm_power_off = efi_power_off
only if we are in hardware reduced mode. Actually, what we also
want is to do this when ACPI S5 is simply not supported on
non-legacy platforms. Since there will be HW-full mode where
the DSDT fails to supply an _S5 object(without SLP_TYP), we
should let such kind of platform to leverage efi runtime service
to poweroff.

This patch uses efi power off as first choice when S5 is
unavailable, even if there is a customized poweroff(driver provided, eg).
Meanwhile, the legacy platforms will not be affected because there is no
path for them to overwrite the pm_power_off to efi power off.

Suggested-by: Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
---
v5:
 - Revert to version 2, enforce EFI poweroff for such kind
   of platforms.
v4:
 - Since in v3 efi_poweroff_required() is not guaranteed to run
   after all of the other code that may register alternative
   power off handling, add the pm_power_off_default that would
   be used by pm_power_off if nothing else is available.
v3:
 - Only assign pm_power_off to efi_power_off when there are no
   other pm_power_off registered at that time, in case other
   commponents would like to customize their own implementation.
---
v2:
 - Convert the acpi_no_s5 to a global bool variable in sleep.c and
   add a declaration to include/linux/acpi.h.
---
 arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c | 2 +-
 drivers/acpi/sleep.c           | 7 +++++++
 include/linux/acpi.h           | 1 +
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
index ed30e79..7e5ec62 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
@@ -340,5 +340,5 @@ bool efi_reboot_required(void)
 
 bool efi_poweroff_required(void)
 {
-	return !!acpi_gbl_reduced_hardware;
+	return acpi_gbl_reduced_hardware || acpi_no_s5;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
index 9cb9752..a33859c 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
@@ -25,6 +25,11 @@
 #include "internal.h"
 #include "sleep.h"
 
+/*
+ * Some HW-full platforms do not have _S5, so they may need
+ * to leverage efi power off for a shutdown.
+ */
+bool acpi_no_s5;
 static u8 sleep_states[ACPI_S_STATE_COUNT];
 
 static void acpi_sleep_tts_switch(u32 acpi_state)
@@ -846,6 +851,8 @@ int __init acpi_sleep_init(void)
 		sleep_states[ACPI_STATE_S5] = 1;
 		pm_power_off_prepare = acpi_power_off_prepare;
 		pm_power_off = acpi_power_off;
+	} else {
+		acpi_no_s5 = true;
 	}
 
 	supported[0] = 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index 06ed7e5..4d2e67f 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ void acpi_irq_stats_init(void);
 extern u32 acpi_irq_handled;
 extern u32 acpi_irq_not_handled;
 extern unsigned int acpi_sci_irq;
+extern bool acpi_no_s5;
 #define INVALID_ACPI_IRQ	((unsigned)-1)
 static inline bool acpi_sci_irq_valid(void)
 {
-- 
1.8.4.2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH][v5] ACPI / PM: Introduce efi poweroff for HW-full platforms without _S5
       [not found] ` <1458484268-18311-1-git-send-email-yu.c.chen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
@ 2016-03-21 12:43   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
       [not found]     ` <CAJZ5v0j1TpjQ8nD3gr7NYA_dpcghDidsvSoAOuobLMw6-3waCg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2016-03-21 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chen Yu, Matt Fleming
  Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List, Rafael J. Wysocki,
	linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	H. Peter Anvin, Len Brown

On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> The problem is Linux registers pm_power_off = efi_power_off
> only if we are in hardware reduced mode. Actually, what we also
> want is to do this when ACPI S5 is simply not supported on
> non-legacy platforms. Since there will be HW-full mode where
> the DSDT fails to supply an _S5 object(without SLP_TYP), we
> should let such kind of platform to leverage efi runtime service
> to poweroff.
>
> This patch uses efi power off as first choice when S5 is
> unavailable, even if there is a customized poweroff(driver provided, eg).
> Meanwhile, the legacy platforms will not be affected because there is no
> path for them to overwrite the pm_power_off to efi power off.
>
> Suggested-by: Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> v5:
>  - Revert to version 2, enforce EFI poweroff for such kind
>    of platforms.
> v4:
>  - Since in v3 efi_poweroff_required() is not guaranteed to run
>    after all of the other code that may register alternative
>    power off handling, add the pm_power_off_default that would
>    be used by pm_power_off if nothing else is available.
> v3:
>  - Only assign pm_power_off to efi_power_off when there are no
>    other pm_power_off registered at that time, in case other
>    commponents would like to customize their own implementation.
> ---
> v2:
>  - Convert the acpi_no_s5 to a global bool variable in sleep.c and
>    add a declaration to include/linux/acpi.h.
> ---
>  arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/acpi/sleep.c           | 7 +++++++
>  include/linux/acpi.h           | 1 +
>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> index ed30e79..7e5ec62 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> @@ -340,5 +340,5 @@ bool efi_reboot_required(void)
>
>  bool efi_poweroff_required(void)
>  {
> -       return !!acpi_gbl_reduced_hardware;
> +       return acpi_gbl_reduced_hardware || acpi_no_s5;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> index 9cb9752..a33859c 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,11 @@
>  #include "internal.h"
>  #include "sleep.h"
>
> +/*
> + * Some HW-full platforms do not have _S5, so they may need
> + * to leverage efi power off for a shutdown.
> + */
> +bool acpi_no_s5;
>  static u8 sleep_states[ACPI_S_STATE_COUNT];
>
>  static void acpi_sleep_tts_switch(u32 acpi_state)
> @@ -846,6 +851,8 @@ int __init acpi_sleep_init(void)
>                 sleep_states[ACPI_STATE_S5] = 1;
>                 pm_power_off_prepare = acpi_power_off_prepare;
>                 pm_power_off = acpi_power_off;
> +       } else {
> +               acpi_no_s5 = true;
>         }
>
>         supported[0] = 0;
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 06ed7e5..4d2e67f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ void acpi_irq_stats_init(void);
>  extern u32 acpi_irq_handled;
>  extern u32 acpi_irq_not_handled;
>  extern unsigned int acpi_sci_irq;
> +extern bool acpi_no_s5;
>  #define INVALID_ACPI_IRQ       ((unsigned)-1)
>  static inline bool acpi_sci_irq_valid(void)
>  {
> --

OK, this is fine by me.

Matt, what do you think?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH][v5] ACPI / PM: Introduce efi poweroff for HW-full platforms without _S5
       [not found]     ` <CAJZ5v0j1TpjQ8nD3gr7NYA_dpcghDidsvSoAOuobLMw6-3waCg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2016-03-21 14:05       ` Matt Fleming
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matt Fleming @ 2016-03-21 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Chen Yu, ACPI Devel Maling List,
	linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	H. Peter Anvin, Len Brown

On Mon, 21 Mar, at 01:43:18PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> OK, this is fine by me.
> 
> Matt, what do you think?

If possible I'd like to see some mention in the commit message of
future Intel Base-IA platforms requiring this support, so when someone
asks me in the future (and I've forgotten the answer) "Why was this
patch get merged?" I can point to the commit log.

But other than that, yeah, this looks good to me. Thanks!

Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-03-21 14:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-03-20 14:31 [PATCH][v5] ACPI / PM: Introduce efi poweroff for HW-full platforms without _S5 Chen Yu
     [not found] ` <1458484268-18311-1-git-send-email-yu.c.chen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-03-21 12:43   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
     [not found]     ` <CAJZ5v0j1TpjQ8nD3gr7NYA_dpcghDidsvSoAOuobLMw6-3waCg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-03-21 14:05       ` Matt Fleming

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).