From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] smp: make wake up idle cpus more generic Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 09:07:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20160401070758.GA28352@gmail.com> References: <1459489819-20435-1-git-send-email-lianwei.wang@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:33915 "EHLO mail-wm0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758211AbcDAHIE (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Apr 2016 03:08:04 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1459489819-20435-1-git-send-email-lianwei.wang@gmail.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Lianwei Wang Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-all@01.org, Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner * Lianwei Wang wrote: > The wake_up_all_idle_cpus API always wake up all the online > cpus, but sometimes we only want to wake up a set of cpus. > > Use a generic function to wake up a group of cpus that is > specified by the cpumask parameter. This generic API can > benefit to the cases that only need to wake up a set of > cpus. What is the new user of this new argument to the wake-up call? Thanks, Ingo