From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: Re: dtc warnings Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 00:16:56 -0500 Message-ID: <20160404051656.GV17806@rob-hp-laptop> References: <56FE27F9.2070100@gmail.com> <56FE7E4A.2000601@ti.com> <20160403065909.GF2987@vireshk-i7> <20160403080854.GA12133@kozik-lap> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:50257 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754657AbcDDFRC (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Apr 2016 01:17:02 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring , Nishanth Menon , Tomi Valkeinen , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Krzysztof Kozlowski , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , arm-platform-maintainers@lists.infradead.org, "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 05:57:00PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 3 April 2016 at 13:38, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Warnings coming from recent linux-next: > > > > DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dtb > > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@1800000000 has a unit name, but no reg property > > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@1700000000 has a unit name, but no reg property > > @Rob: What should we be doing about these warnings? > OPP-entries don't have a reg property obviously and we > discussed earlier if naming them based on freq is fine or > not. We can whitelist opp nodes in dtc, use oppN instead, or ignore the warnings for now. Rob