From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bjorn Helgaas Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] PCI: Add Thunderbolt device IDs Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 18:27:12 -0500 Message-ID: <20160405232712.GI15353@localhost> References: <20160317150320.GA22769@localhost> <20160320131135.GA29174@wunner.de> <20160320171246.GB16658@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160320171246.GB16658@kroah.com> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Lukas Wunner , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Noever , Matthew Garrett List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 10:12:46AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 02:11:35PM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > Hi Bjorn, > > > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:03:20AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 03:50:35PM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > > > Gen 1 and 2 chips use the same ID for NHI, bridges and switch. > > > > Gen 3 chips and onward use a distinct ID for the NHI. > > > > > > I assume this is strictly using #defines instead of bare numbers and > > > hence "no functional change intended." > > > > > > > Cc: Andreas Noever > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner > > > > > > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas > > > > Thanks, I've just posted a 3 patch series to support the Light Ridge > > Thunderbolt controller and included your ack for this patch. > > > > > > > I assume somebody else will merge this with the rest of the series. > > > > The maintainer of the thunderbolt driver is Andreas Noever, however > > I don't think Andreas sends pull requests to Linus. Everything in > > drivers/thunderbolt/ has so far been picked up by Greg KH. > > > > I have more thunderbolt stuff in the pipeline, some of which needs > > changes to drivers/pci/. Therefore it would be ideal from my perspective > > if my thunderbolt patches could go in via your tree, if that is possible. > > I have no objection if they go through the PCI tree, especially as > Thunderbolt really just is PCI express, it makes sense to take them that > way. Andreas, what's your preference? If you want me to merge Thunderbolt stuff via my PCI tree, I can do that. But I don't know anything about Thunderbolt and don't have specs or ability to test it, so I would rely on you to ack any changes. If you'd like to merge Thunderbolt stuff yourself, that would be less work for me, so even better :) But either way is fine. Bjorn