From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Rearrange cpufreq_add_dev()
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 10:00:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160407043010.GC14903@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25180596.UsWVYNr6Fj@vostro.rjw.lan>
On 07-04-16, 03:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> Reorganize the code in cpufreq_add_dev() to avoid using the ret
> variable and reduce the indentation level in it.
>
> No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1311,26 +1311,24 @@ out_free_policy:
> */
> static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
> {
> + struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
> unsigned cpu = dev->id;
> - int ret;
>
> dev_dbg(dev, "%s: adding CPU%u\n", __func__, cpu);
>
> - if (cpu_online(cpu)) {
> - ret = cpufreq_online(cpu);
> - } else {
> - /*
> - * A hotplug notifier will follow and we will handle it as CPU
> - * online then. For now, just create the sysfs link, unless
> - * there is no policy or the link is already present.
> - */
> - struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
> + if (cpu_online(cpu))
> + return cpufreq_online(cpu);
>
> - ret = policy && !cpumask_test_and_set_cpu(cpu, policy->real_cpus)
> - ? add_cpu_dev_symlink(policy, cpu) : 0;
> - }
> + /*
> + * A hotplug notifier will follow and we will handle it as CPU online
> + * then. For now, just create the sysfs link, unless there is no policy
> + * or the link is already present.
> + */
> + policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
> + if (!policy || cpumask_test_and_set_cpu(cpu, policy->real_cpus))
> + return 0;
>
> - return ret;
> + return add_cpu_dev_symlink(policy, cpu);
> }
>
> static void cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
--
viresh
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-07 4:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-07 1:31 [PATCH] cpufreq: Rearrange cpufreq_add_dev() Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-04-07 4:30 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160407043010.GC14903@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox