From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rt@linutronix.de,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "Van De Ven,
Arjan" <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal/intel_powerclamp: convert to smpboot thread
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 10:21:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160412082141.GB16146@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <570BCB15.1010702@linutronix.de>
On Mon 2016-04-11 18:04:37, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 04/11/2016 05:19 PM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> >>>> I tried to convert it over to smpboot thread so we don't have that
> >>>> CPU notifier stuff to fire the cpu threads during hotplug events.
> >>>>
> >>> there is another patchset to convert it to kthread worker. any
> >>> advantage of smpboot thread?
> >>> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/144964
> >>
> >> It partly does the same thing except you still have your hotplug
> >> notifier which I wanted to get rid off. However it looks better than
> >> before.
> >> If you do prefer the kworker thingy then please switch from CPU_DEAD
> >> to CPU_DOWN_PREPARE (and add CPU_DOWN_FAILED to CPU_ONLINE).
> >> With those changes I should have no further problem with it :)
> >> Any ETA for (either of those patches) upstream?
It depends on some improvements of the kthread worker API. I hope
that we are getting close. I would like to send another iteration
later this week.
Best Regards,
Petr
> > +Petr
> > I do prefer not to keep track of CPU hotplug events. Let me do some
> > testing.
> Okay. Please keep me posted where you stand on this. If you go for the
> kwork series then I will try to make a patch which replaces CPU_DEAD to
> CPU_DOWN_PREPARE in order to make it symmetrical (and from what it
> looks, there is no need to run at CPU_DEAD time).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-12 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-11 15:38 [PATCH] thermal/intel_powerclamp: convert to smpboot thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-04-06 16:47 ` Jacob Pan
2016-04-11 12:47 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-04-11 15:19 ` Jacob Pan
2016-04-11 16:04 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-04-12 8:21 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2016-04-13 14:20 ` Jacob Pan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160412082141.GB16146@pathway.suse.cz \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rt@linutronix.de \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox