linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
To: Emrah Demir <ed@abdsec.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com>,
	Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	x86@kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, keescook@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kaslr: allow kASLR to be default over Hibernation
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 21:58:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160416195809.GA25795@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fd9b0950f40aaffbdaa30e9cf75a9e5b@abdsec.com>

On Fri 2016-04-15 12:25:19, Emrah Demir wrote:
> On 2016-04-14 18:42, Kees Cook wrote:
> >On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de> wrote:
> >>On Thu 2016-04-14 13:14:07, Kees Cook wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de> wrote:
> >>>> Hi!
> >>>>
> >>>>> Since kASLR and Hibernation can not currently coexist at runtime
> >>>>> on x86, the default behavior was to disable kASLR by default when
> >>>>> CONFIG_HIBERNATION was present (to retain original behavior).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The behavior of kASLR on arm64 (and soon MIPS) is to be enabled by
> >>>>> default when selected at build time. Since arm64 Hibernation does not
> >>>>> conflict with kASLR, this fixes the hibernation argument parsing to be
> >>>>> x86-specific. Additionally, since end users want to be able to select
> >>>>> kASLR on x86 by default at build time, create CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE_ON
> >>>>> that is present only on x86.
> 
> >>>>
> >>>> I believe this is bad idea. arm64 shows that kaslr and hibernation can
> >>>> coexist, and hibernation is still useful when your battery runs out.
> >>>
> >>>What? I'm confused -- this patch leaves the x86 behavior as-is by
> >>>default but allows hibernation to work with arm64. (For example, right
> >>>now, if you boot arm64 with "kaslr" kernel argument, hibernation will
> >>>get needlessly disabled.)
> >>
> 
> So what about making new kernel parameters. "hibernate" and "nohibernate"
> 
> This way before decompression it will look at the parameters and depend on
> parameters it will act differently
> 
> "kaslr" "nohibernate"  -->  kASLR will enable, no hibernate
> 
> "nokaslr" "nohibernate" --> Neither of them will work
> 
> "kaslr" "hiberante"   ---> Owner has to face consequences(ARM has
> advantages)
> 
> "nokaslr" "hibernate"  ---> kASLR disabled and hibernate will works.
> 
> Before writing something I want to know your ideas.

Patch fixing hibernation with kaslr on x86 and x86-64 would be
welcome.

Adding command line options that will become useless when kernel is
fixed ... not so much.

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

      reply	other threads:[~2016-04-16 19:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-12 22:16 [PATCH v2] kaslr: allow kASLR to be default over Hibernation Kees Cook
2016-04-14 20:01 ` Pavel Machek
2016-04-14 20:14   ` Kees Cook
2016-04-14 20:34     ` Pavel Machek
2016-04-14 22:42       ` Kees Cook
2016-04-15  9:20         ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-15 13:06         ` Pavel Machek
2016-04-15 16:25         ` Emrah Demir
2016-04-16 19:58           ` Pavel Machek [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160416195809.GA25795@amd \
    --to=pavel@denx.de \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=corsac@debian.org \
    --cc=ed@abdsec.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=keescook@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=matt.redfearn@imgtec.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).