From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] cpufreq: shmobile: Use generic platdev driver Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 08:51:42 +0530 Message-ID: <20160422032142.GN29799@vireshk-i7> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Rafael Wysocki , Simon Horman , Magnus Damm , linaro-kernel , Linux PM list , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 21-04-16, 15:04, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Viresh, > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c > > @@ -29,6 +29,18 @@ static const struct of_device_id machines[] = { > > { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5800", }, > > #endif > > > > I think an #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_RENESAS block wouldn't hurt, likewise > for the other SoCs. > Soon you'll have this file filled with lots of compatible values for random\ > SoCs... This is going to be done once per boot and this shouldn't hurt. And for new platforms we may do things differently as they are going to use opp-v2 bindings. And, so I am not really in favor of ifdef hackery :) -- viresh