From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] cpufreq: shmobile: Use generic platdev driver Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 12:17:33 +0530 Message-ID: <20160422064733.GA13716@vireshk-i7> References: <20160422032142.GN29799@vireshk-i7> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f176.google.com ([209.85.192.176]:35309 "EHLO mail-pf0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751791AbcDVGrh (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Apr 2016 02:47:37 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f176.google.com with SMTP id n1so38386558pfn.2 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 23:47:36 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Rafael Wysocki , Simon Horman , Magnus Damm , linaro-kernel , Linux PM list , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" On 22-04-16, 08:41, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > I was mainly thinking about kernel size. Ahh, I see.. > If this is done once per boot, the array should be __initconst, > (looking at the code > in next) which is fine as cpufreq_dt_platdev_init() is already __init. Sure, makes sense.. I will do that as a separate patch. Though just to correct what I earlier said, if cpufreq-dt is developed as a module, its done once per module insertion :) -- viresh