From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/7] PM / OPP: -ENOSYS is applicable only to syscalls Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 17:42:47 -0700 Message-ID: <20160503004247.GJ3492@codeaurora.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Rafael Wysocki , Viresh Kumar , Nishanth Menon , linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, arnd.bergmann@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 04/27, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Some of the routines have used -ENOSYS for the cases where the > functionality isn't implemented in the kernel. But ENOSYS is supposed to > be used only for syscalls. > > Replace that with -ENOTSUPP, which specifically means that the operation > isn't supported. > > While at it, replace exiting -EINVAL errors for similar cases to > -ENOTSUPP. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar > --- Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project