From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [RFC] Should we add Android's Interactive governor into mainline now? Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 08:49:18 +0530 Message-ID: <20160513031918.GD3415@vireshk-i7> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f171.google.com ([209.85.192.171]:35552 "EHLO mail-pf0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751502AbcEMDTW (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2016 23:19:22 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 77so37208437pfv.2 for ; Thu, 12 May 2016 20:19:22 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Peter Zijlstra , Linaro Kernel Mailman List , Ingo Molnar , Morten Rasmussen , Juri Lelli , Steve Muckle , Vincent Guittot On 12-05-16, 15:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Actually, the last submission did not receive any comments from > anyone, so I'd call it lack of interest rather than rejection. The last attempt had 70 patches in it :) > I think that we'd be better off if the interactive governor was in the > tree, so if you have the time to work on it, that's great. > > One caveat is that I have some governor API rearrangement in the works > and you'd need to rebase your work on top of that. I've just sent two > patches, but there's more to come. That wouldn't be an issue and anyway I will take some time (I have to find some first) to do that :) -- viresh