From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Should we add Android's Interactive governor into mainline
 now?
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 16:39:46 +0530
Message-ID: <20160513110946.GD2793@vireshk-i7>
References: <CAKohponvfRR=nDPcVWpW0L1JZO9+7hgLL7YrWwyJXkL8BtJNpg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJZ5v0g3Q+CUo6U55hCBSCMhmcZJ5Or2Ctq7OJx3hxaiDx+F1A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160513031918.GD3415@vireshk-i7>
 <CAJZ5v0hxVzFyVpU=Nwvm+SPmy-JnQz_dr-5dAj8S_FCEY=1fnA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.220.48]:35944 "EHLO
	mail-pa0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751555AbcEMLJu (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 13 May 2016 07:09:50 -0400
Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id bt5so39602616pac.3
        for <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>; Fri, 13 May 2016 04:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0hxVzFyVpU=Nwvm+SPmy-JnQz_dr-5dAj8S_FCEY=1fnA@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Linaro Kernel Mailman List <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>, Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

On 13-05-16, 13:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 5:19 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On 12-05-16, 15:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> Actually, the last submission did not receive any comments from
> >> anyone, so I'd call it lack of interest rather than rejection.
> >
> > The last attempt had 70 patches in it :)
> 
> Just for the record, this was the last attempt:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7514441/

Yeah, he sent a single patch as well (which failed to build). But
yeah, I was talking about his attempts only :)

-- 
viresh