From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [patch v2] PM / devfreq: exynos-nocp: Remove incorrect IS_ERR() check Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 16:56:00 +0300 Message-ID: <20160526135600.GE10957@mwanda> References: <20160526064541.GA6680@mwanda> <5746AFE3.6030606@samsung.com> <20160526115629.GD10957@mwanda> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:35585 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753715AbcEZN4Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 May 2016 09:56:25 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: cw00.choi@samsung.com Cc: Julia Lawall , MyungJoo Ham , Kyungmin Park , Kukjin Kim , Krzysztof Kozlowski , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , linux-samsung-soc , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:46:26PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 05:12:19PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > >> I don't recommend that you mention the name of engineer on patch description > >> directly. > > > > This really is normal. I've been mentioned over 100 times in commit > > messages like 7051924f771 (xillybus: Move out of staging). > > I'm still reluctant to use the name on description. I understand that but I don't understand why, though. Anyway, aren't forwarding this to someone? You can change it to say whatever you want. regards, dan carpenter